Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: Voting for classification method




Detection Ad Hoc,

I would like to place my support for option 2.

I would like to know how many catagories you feel this method can support in
view of issues with component tolerence?

Best Regards

Robert.

-----Original Message-----
From: Amir Lehr [mailto:AmirL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 01 April 2001 16:27
To: stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Voting for classification method



Detection Ad Hoc,

You can count my support to option 2.

Regards,
Amir Lehr

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Stewart, Donald S (Don) [SMTP:dsstewart@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent:	ה, מרץ 29, 2001 7:19 AM
> To:	IEEE Detection Ad Hoc (E-mail)
> Cc:	Stewart, Donald S (Don)
> Subject:	Beginning to summarize the viable candidates for detection
> with classification
> 
> Detection Ad Hoc,  
> 
> Before we take any multi-votes or votes on possibilities for detection
> with classification, I want to give people a chance to tune-up the list we
> use. Please see the list below. Any comments are welcomed, but
> particularly if a category is missing or if I am seeing this differently
> than many of you are. I realize I have included some candidates that have
> been unpopular. But I see no harm in including them in voting.
> 
> Thanks 
> Don 
> ____________________ 
> 
> Candidate approaches to detection with classification 
> 
> 1) PD: exhibits 25 K ohm slope for 2.8 to 10 volts and exhibits one of a
> few constant current levels  for ~12 to 30v 
>    PSE: detects slope with equivalent of two mesurements and constant
> current with at least one measurement 
> 
> 2) PD: exhibits 25 K ohm slope for 2.8 to 10 volts and exhibits one of a
> few different resistance slopes for ~12 to 30v 
> 
>    PSE: detects first slope with equivalent of two mesurements and second
> slope with equivalent of  two measurements 
> 
> (3) Have PD exhibit maximum current draw shortly after detection (infinite
> power classes) 
> 
> (4) Combination of 1, 2. [Similar to one we voted on in Hilton Head. I
> propose we not vote on something as vague as this. Could someone propose a
> specific behavior they champion if they really want this voted?]
> 
> (5) Do it with the PHY 
> 
> (6) Any others? 
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________ 
> Donald (Don) S. Stewart                  Phone:  732-817-5495 
> Avaya Inc.                                      FAX:  732-817-4666 
> Cross_Product Architecture 
> 101 Crawfords Corner Road 
> Holmdel, NJ 
>