Voting for classification method
Detection Ad Hoc,
You can count my support to option 2.
Regards,
Amir Lehr
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stewart, Donald S (Don) [SMTP:dsstewart@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: ה, מרץ 29, 2001 7:19 AM
> To: IEEE Detection Ad Hoc (E-mail)
> Cc: Stewart, Donald S (Don)
> Subject: Beginning to summarize the viable candidates for detection
> with classification
>
> Detection Ad Hoc,
>
> Before we take any multi-votes or votes on possibilities for detection
> with classification, I want to give people a chance to tune-up the list we
> use. Please see the list below. Any comments are welcomed, but
> particularly if a category is missing or if I am seeing this differently
> than many of you are. I realize I have included some candidates that have
> been unpopular. But I see no harm in including them in voting.
>
> Thanks
> Don
> ____________________
>
> Candidate approaches to detection with classification
>
> 1) PD: exhibits 25 K ohm slope for 2.8 to 10 volts and exhibits one of a
> few constant current levels for ~12 to 30v
> PSE: detects slope with equivalent of two mesurements and constant
> current with at least one measurement
>
> 2) PD: exhibits 25 K ohm slope for 2.8 to 10 volts and exhibits one of a
> few different resistance slopes for ~12 to 30v
>
> PSE: detects first slope with equivalent of two mesurements and second
> slope with equivalent of two measurements
>
> (3) Have PD exhibit maximum current draw shortly after detection (infinite
> power classes)
>
> (4) Combination of 1, 2. [Similar to one we voted on in Hilton Head. I
> propose we not vote on something as vague as this. Could someone propose a
> specific behavior they champion if they really want this voted?]
>
> (5) Do it with the PHY
>
> (6) Any others?
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> Donald (Don) S. Stewart Phone: 732-817-5495
> Avaya Inc. FAX: 732-817-4666
> Cross_Product Architecture
> 101 Crawfords Corner Road
> Holmdel, NJ
>