Re: [RE] DRAFT Objectives 09/30/2004
John,
Good point. That is, after all, the primary requirement.
One could argue the low guaranteed jitter implies the
same, but that's probably a bit too subtle.
DVJ
David V. James
3180 South Ct
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Home: +1.650.494.0926
+1.650.856.9801
Cell: +1.650.954.6906
Fax: +1.360.242.5508
Base: dvj@alum.mit.edu
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-stds-802-3-re@IEEE.ORG
>> [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-re@IEEE.ORG]On Behalf Of John Gildred
>> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 6:36 PM
>> To: STDS-802-3-RE@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>> Subject: Re: [RE] DRAFT Objectives 09/30/2004
>>
>>
>> I think the issue of guaranteed bandwidth allocation is important and
>> perhaps not captured in the list. It needs to be stated outright that
>> an isochronous channel may not be interrupted by other traffic at any
>> time.
>>
>> -John Gildred
>> Vice President of Engineering
>> Pioneer Research Center USA
>> A Division of Pioneer Electronics
>> 101 Metro Drive, Suite 264
>> San Jose, California 95110
>> john@pioneer-pra.com
>> (408) 437-1800 x105
>> (408) 437-1717 Fax
>> (510) 295-7770 Mobile
>>
>> On Sep 30, 2004, at 1:33 PM, Steve Carlson wrote:
>>
>> > Colleagues,
>> >
>> > Attached is the PDF of the RESG Draft Objectives 09/30/2004.
>> >
>> > David, can you please post these to the Website?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Steve
>> >
>> > Steven B. Carlson
>> > President
>> > Chair, IEEE 802.3 Residential Ethernet Study Group
>> > Secretary, IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD Working Group
>> > http://www.ieee802.org/3/
>> > High Speed Design, Inc.
>> > 11929 NW Old Quarry Road
>> > Portland, OR 97229
>> > 503.626.4206
>> > FAX 503.626.4206
>> > scarlson@hspdesign.com<RESG_draft_objectives_09_30_04.pdf>