Re: [RE] DRAFT Objectives 09/30/2004

[Richard Brand <rbrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

John:
Regarding your comment, what would you offer as a bulletized version
of your objective?
Richard

John Gildred wrote:

 

I think the issue of guaranteed bandwidth allocation is important and
perhaps not captured in the list. It needs to be stated outright that
an isochronous channel may not be interrupted by other traffic at any
time.

-John Gildred
Vice President of Engineering
Pioneer Research Center USA
A Division of Pioneer Electronics
101 Metro Drive, Suite 264
San Jose, California 95110
john@pioneer-pra.com
(408) 437-1800 x105
(408) 437-1717 Fax
(510) 295-7770 Mobile

On Sep 30, 2004, at 1:33 PM, Steve Carlson wrote:

> Colleagues,
>
> Attached is the PDF of the RESG Draft Objectives 09/30/2004.
>
> David, can you please post these to the Website?
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve
>
> Steven B. Carlson
> President
> Chair, IEEE 802.3 Residential Ethernet Study Group
> Secretary, IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD Working Group
> http://www.ieee802.org/3/
> High Speed Design, Inc.
> 11929 NW Old Quarry Road
> Portland, OR 97229
> 503.626.4206
> FAX 503.626.4206
> scarlson@hspdesign.com<RESG_draft_objectives_09_30_04.pdf>

begin:vcard
n:Brand;Richard C.
tel;work:(408) 495 2462 : ESN 265 2462
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Advanced Technology
adr:;;4655 Great America Pkway;Santa Clara;Ca.;95054;
version:2.1
email;internet:rbrand@Nortelnetworks.com
title:Director, Network Architecture & Applications
fn:Richard C. Brand
end:vcard