Re: [RE] DRAFT Objectives 09/30/2004
"Guaranteed bandwidth allocation as isochronous channels may not be
interrupted by other traffic at any time"
By the way, this is true over a single link, not just in the bridged
case. Several applications fighting for bandwidth over a single link
will need a bandwidth allocation mechanism.
-John Gildred
Vice President of Engineering
Pioneer Research Center USA
A Division of Pioneer Electronics
101 Metro Drive, Suite 264
San Jose, California 95110
john@pioneer-pra.com
(408) 437-1800 x105
(408) 437-1717 Fax
(510) 295-7770 Mobile
On Sep 30, 2004, at 10:27 PM, Richard Brand wrote:
> John:
> Regarding your comment, what would you offer as a bulletized version
> of your objective?
> Richard
>
> John Gildred wrote:
>
>
> I think the issue of guaranteed bandwidth allocation is important and
> perhaps not captured in the list. It needs to be stated outright that
> an isochronous channel may not be interrupted by other traffic at any
> time.
>
> -John Gildred
> Vice President of Engineering
> Pioneer Research Center USA
> A Division of Pioneer Electronics
> 101 Metro Drive, Suite 264
> San Jose, California 95110
> john@pioneer-pra.com
> (408) 437-1800 x105
> (408) 437-1717 Fax
> (510) 295-7770 Mobile
>
> On Sep 30, 2004, at 1:33 PM, Steve Carlson wrote:
>
> > Colleagues,
> >
> > Attached is the PDF of the RESG Draft Objectives 09/30/2004.
> >
> > David, can you please post these to the Website?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > Steven B. Carlson
> > President
> > Chair, IEEE 802.3 Residential Ethernet Study Group
> > Secretary, IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD Working Group
> > http://www.ieee802.org/3/
> > High Speed Design, Inc.
> > 11929 NW Old Quarry Road
> > Portland, OR 97229
> > 503.626.4206
> > FAX 503.626.4206
> > scarlson@hspdesign.com<RESG_draft_objectives_09_30_04.pdf>
> <rbrand.vcf>