Re: [RE] Objectives summary for a paper ...

[Richard Brand <rbrand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dirceau:
On the contrary keep stirring things up as that is the only way we
will see real change.  My comment was in no way meant to be a throttle
but more a call to arms to some others.
Comments from those others?
Very sincerely,
Richard

Dirceu Cavendish wrote:

 

I didn't mean to stir things up, but only focus on the application side
of the synch support. I like # 6 statement below, if it is acceptable to
everyone.

Dirceu Cavendish
NEC Labs America
10080 North Wolfe Road Suite SW3-350
Cupertino, CA 95014
Tel: 408-863-6041 Fax: 408-863-6099

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-3-re@IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-re@IEEE.ORG]
On Behalf Of Michael D. Johas Teener
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 3:57 PM
To: STDS-802-3-RE@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [RE] Objectives summary for a paper ...

How about:

6.  High quality synchronization services that provide all stations with
a
low jitter ³house clock² to be used both for scheduling isochronous
packets
and to provide a common time base for sampling and presenting streaming
data.
 

On 11/10/04 3:02 PM, "Dirceu Cavendish" <dirceu@SV.NEC-LABS.COM> wrote:

> I think you have captured the main requirements there, Michael. I
would
> just add end-point synchronization, which is synch between
> applications...not network elements.
>
> Dirceu Cavendish
> NEC Labs America
> 10080 North Wolfe Road Suite SW3-350
> Cupertino, CA 95014
> Tel: 408-863-6041 Fax: 408-863-6099

--
Michael D. Johas Teener
-- http://public.xdi.org/=Michael.Johas.Teener --- PGP ID 0x3179D202