RE: [LinkSec] Meeting notes 12/3
Paul,
I hope to see you (and other members of the 'core' 802.1 group) participating in the calls and preparation of the January meeting. In my opinion you are not 'out-of-order' - quite the contrary. Defining a consistent authentication framework and the specific data model to support it is a subject that should be on the agenda of the future security work.
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CONGDON,PAUL (HP-Roseville,ex1) [mailto:paul.congdon@hp.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 11:00 PM
> To: Dolors Sala; allyn romanow
> Cc: stds-802-linksec@ieee.org
> Subject: RE: [LinkSec] Meeting notes 12/3
>
>
>
>
> Dolors,
>
> I would like to attend the next phone call and at least
> bring-up the topic
> of how 802 specific Radius attributes are defined and
> managed. This may not
> be consider part of this groups scope, but then again there
> could be an
> agreement that some form of 802 involvement is required.
> This also makes
> the base assumption that the 802.1X framework will continue
> to be pursued,
> so I may be jumping the gun here as well. At least I'd like
> to discuss the
> potential relevance.
>
> Paul
>
> +------------------------------------------+
> Paul Congdon
> HP ProCurve Networking
> Hewlett Packard Company
> 8000 Foothills Blvd - M/S 5662
> Roseville, CA 95747
> phone: 916-785-5753
> email: paul_congdon@hp.com
> +------------------------------------------+
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dolors Sala [mailto:dolors@ieee.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 10:29 PM
> > To: allyn romanow
> > Cc: stds-802-linksec@ieee.org
> > Subject: Re: [LinkSec] Meeting notes 12/3
> >
> >
> >
> > Allyn,
> >
> > Thanks for volunteering to post the call minutes.
> >
> > I would like to motivate a little the discussion on what it
> > is needed to take the initial decisions required by the
> > group. Our main focus is to define scope and recommend a
> > placement of this project within 802.
> >
> > During the call we identified the following topics as major
> > criteria factors and target topics for next week call and
> > reflector discussion.
> >
> > > Summary- for Vancouver meeting we need:
> > > scenarios, and requirements
> > > arch model
> >
> > > key management
> >
> > Mick and Bob volunteered to produce material on the
> > architecture model. Antti will work on EPON scenarios. Dennis
> > Volpano has initiated discussion on requirements. So work is
> > moving forward in all these topics and discussion will
> > continue on the reflector and calls.
> >
> > In addition to these topics, are there additional thoughts or
> > perspectives on how to identify scope, and the placement of
> > this project?
> >
> > Dolors
> >
>