Re: [802SEC] +++ SEC Rules Change Letter Ballot +++ Ballot on WG electronic voting
Paul,
This makes sense and is what I was assuming.
The confusing point was that your email indicated that
for the current SEC motion a failure to vote was counted as a NO.
I took a quick look at the rules and it is not clear to me why a
fail to vote on an SEC motion is a no vote. Rather the rule 3.4.2.1
appears to state that a majority of the voting SEC members must reply.
mike
Paul Nikolich wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> The quorom for an electonic ballot is that 50% of the working group voting
> members must respond YES, NO or ABSTAIN. This is exactly the same as a
> quorum for any WG meeting that is not held during a plenary session.
>
> --Paul
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert D. Love [mailto:rdlove@nc.rr.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:49 PM
> To: Mike Takefman; p.nikolich@ieee.org
> Cc: 'IEEE802'
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ SEC Rules Change Letter Ballot +++ Ballot on
> WG electronic voting
>
> Mike, I believe 50% of the eligible voters voting YES, NO, or ABSTAIN, is a
> quorum for electronic balloting. See the 802.5 Working Group electronic
> balloting rules I posted on the 802.17 reflector which explicitly specify
> that.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Robert D. Love
> Chair, Resilient Packet Ring Alliance
> President, LAN Connect Consultants
> 7105 Leveret Circle Raleigh, NC 27615
> Phone: 919 848-6773 Mobile: 919 810-7816
> email: rdlove@ieee.org Fax: 208 978-1187
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Takefman" <tak@cisco.com>
> To: <p.nikolich@ieee.org>
> Cc: "'IEEE802'" <stds-802-sec@ieee.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ SEC Rules Change Letter Ballot +++ Ballot on WG
> electronic voting
>
> >
> > Paul,
> >
> > a question from one of my people. What consitutes a quorum for an
> > electronic vote (either motion or ballot).
> >
> > For example, this SEC rules change ballot marks a failure to vote
> > as a vote against. Hence, one could argue there is no quorum requirement
> > as all voters end up with either a no or whatever they actually responded
> > with and 100% of the voters are counted.
> >
> > Another interpretation is similar to those of a meeting. Specifically
> > the number of people who respond to the ballot as a yes or no or abstain
> > must be greater than 50% of the voting members.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > mike
> >
> > Paul Nikolich wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear SEC members,
> > >
> > > Attached you will find the text for the SEC rules change letter ballot
> on WG
> > > Electronic Voting.
> > >
> > > Scope: To permit voting by electronic means at the working group level.
> > >
> > > Purpose: To facilitate the WG consensus process.
> > >
> > > The ballot opens March 18, 2002 and closes June 8, 2002 12 midnight EDT
> > > (remember if you do not vote or abstain it is equivalent to a DISAPPROVE
> > > vote). Buzz, please ensure this gets sent to the 802-wide email list as
> > > well. WG chairs, please invite your WG members to comment through you.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --Paul Nikolich
> > >
> > > Chair, IEEE802 LAN/MAN Standards Project
> > > email: p.nikolich@ieee.org
> > > cell: 857.205.0050
> > > mail: 18 Bishops Lane, Lynnfield, MA 01940
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------
> > > Name: MAR2002
> rules change on wg electronic balloting.pdf
> > > MAR2002 rules change on wg electronic balloting.pdf Type: Acrobat
> (application/pdf)
> > > Encoding: base64
> >
> > --
> > Michael Takefman tak@cisco.com
> > Manager of Engineering, Cisco Systems
> > Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
> > 2000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
> > voice: 613-254-3399 fax: 613-254-4867
--
Michael Takefman tak@cisco.com
Manager of Engineering, Cisco Systems
Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
2000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
voice: 613-254-3399 fax: 613-254-4867