Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] +++10 day ECM+++authorize FCC submission of Coexistence presentation



Glen,
  I agree with your changes and see that they are an improvement.
I wish I had suggested them.
Regards,
Jon

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Rosdahl             Engineer, Senior Staff
CSR Technology Inc. - A Qualcomm company
cell:801-376-6435         10871 North 5750 West
office: 801-492-4023      Highland, UT 84003

A Job is only necessary to eat!

A Family is necessary to be happy!!

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Glenn Parsons <glenn.parsons@ericsson.com> wrote:

Colleagues,

 

To be clear,  I approve with editorial suggestions.  Attached are the editorials in track changes.

 

Cheers,

Glenn.

 

From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Glenn Parsons
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 11:02 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++10 day ECM+++authorize FCC submission of Coexistence presentation

 

Paul,

 

My apologies for the late reply…

 

As Roger, I think the liaison can be fine tuned.  So in addition to his points:

 

a)      My understanding of the FCC request is that it is specific on LTE-U and LAA.  But in this letter we introduce “unlicensed LTE” which is vague.  Since this letter is only about 3GPP LAA, I would replace this with LAA in the first paragraph and delete “a form of unlicensed LTE known as” in the second paragraph

b)      The letter also says “ 3GPP will make its draft LAA specification  available for external review in Q42015” which is confusing as 3GPP drafts are not password protected like 802.  I can see why we don’t want to highlight that difference, so maybe we could refer to a liaison 3GPP will send us indicating it is time to review?

c)       Since you are highlighting collaboration, should the letter also note that 3GPP gave a presentation that IEEE 802 welcomed?

d)      Finally, the workshop presentation has some specific technical proposals.  Are these our final answer to the FCC?  Or should we indicate in the letter that this was our proposal to 3GPP, and we will discuss details further with 3GPP?

 

Otherwise I approve.

 

Cheers,

Glenn.

 

--

Glenn Parsons - Chair, IEEE 802.1

glenn.parsons@ericsson.com

+1-613-963-8141

 

 

 

From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 7:59 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] +++10 day ECM+++authorize FCC submission of Coexistence presentation

 

Dear EC Members,

 

Several of the participants at the the 29AUG2015 3GPP Coexistence Workshop in Beijing, suggested that we submit the 802 coexistence slide deck presented by Andrew to the FCC as part of DA 15-516.  Remember, the 802 EC approved the slide deck 17AUG2015.  I agreed as long as we provided a cover letter and obtained 802 EC approval, henceforth the below motion.

Motion: To authorize the 802 Chair to submit the cover letter DCN EC-15-0082-00EC (attached) and the 802 coexistence workshop slide deck document DCN 19-15-0069-07-000(https://mentor.ieee.org/802.19/dcn/15/19-15-0069-07-0000-ieee-802-submission-to-3gpp-laa-workshop.pptx) to the FCC as part of the Public Notice DA 15-516 which seeks information on current trends in LTE-U and LAA technology, granting the 802 Chair editorial license as determined during the course of the email ballot.

Moved: Adrian Stephens
Second: Jon Rosdahl

Start of ballot: Monday 19 October 2015
Close of ballot: Friday 30 October 11:59PM AOE 2015

This EC email ballot will be conducted under our early close provision.  As required in subclause 4.1.2 'Voting rules' of the IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC) Operations Manual, this is notice that, to ensure the release is provided in a timely manner, this ballot may close early once sufficient responses are received to clearly decide a matter.

Sufficient responses to clearly decide this matter will be based on the required majority for a motion under subclause 7.1.1 'Actions requiring approval by a majority vote' item (h), 'Other motions brought to the floor by members (when deemed in order by the Sponsor Chair)' of the IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC) Policies and Procedures.

 

Regards,

 

--Paul

 

 

 

 

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.