If we’re voting on it, I like Roger’s the best.
Patrick Kinney Kinney Consulting +1.847.960.3715 pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com On Feb 3, 2022, at 10:11, Clint Powell <cpowell@ieee.org> wrote:
Perhaps this reordering/rewording. “IEEE Std 802.15.3d-2017 identifies 15 GHz of spectrum, per footnote 5.565, where protection of passive service from harmful interference is required.” BR, Clint From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org> On Behalf Of pat.kinney@KINNEYCONSULTINGLLC.COM
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 9:03 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Ofcom response proposed editorial Perhaps it’s just me, but it still sounds awkward. However, it’s understandable. hi Roger, Thomas saw your point on the line in the Ofcom response and here is a proposed replacement line: “There are still 15 GHz of spectrum left in IEEE Std 802.15.3d-2017 that can be used only under the regime of footnote 5.565, where protection of passive service from harmful interference is required.” I think it does work pretty well; are you okay with this editorial edit? thanks jay
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1
|