| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Edward,
I reviewed the motion template (See https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/16/ec-16-0170-04-00EC-802-ec-motion-template.pptx - Motion: Communication from 802.
Please note that it reads as follows –
- Approve <doc-url> as communication to <recipient>, granting the IEEE LMSC chair (or his delegate) editorial license.
Please note that your wording does not reflect this.
I will update the provided motions accordingly, where I am assuming you are James delegate.
John
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org> On Behalf Of Edward Au
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2024 1:46 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] Consent agenda request re: +++EC review+++ two draft IEEE 802 LMSC submissions to Japan MIC and Belgium BIPT
Dear John,
Following the end of the offline review that I receive no comments on both draft responses, may I add the following motions to the consent agenda of the LMSC opening meeting on Monday, 11 November 2024?
Motion 1: Draft response to Japan MIC's consultation
Move to approve document https://mentor.ieee.org/802.18/dcn/24/18-24-0100-05-0000-proposed-repsonse-to-japan-mic-s-consultation-on-frequency-reorganization-plan-2024.pdf for submission to MIC before the submission deadline, with editorial license granted to the IEEE 802.18 chair.
o Approved in the RR-TAG: _12_ / _0_ / _1_ (The Chair did not vote)
Mover: Edward Au
Seconder: Robert Stacey
Motion 2: Draft response to Belgium BIPT's consultationMove to approve document https://mentor.ieee.org/802.18/dcn/24/18-24-0102-02-0000-proposed-response-to-belgium-bipt-s-consultation-on-uwb-regulation.pdf for submission to BIPT before the submission deadline, with editorial license granted to the IEEE 802.18 chair.
o Approved in the RR-TAG: _11_ / _1_ / _1_ (The Chair did not vote)
Mover: Edward AuSeconder: Clint Powell
Please kindly advise.
Regards,
Edward
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 12:12 PM Edward Au <edward.ks.au@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
I would like to request the review of the following two draft IEEE 802 LMSC submissions by Monday 28 October 2024, A.O.E, before asking the LMSC to tentatively consider approval of these two submissions via the 10-day letter ballots:
1) Japan MIC's consultation on frequency reorganization plan
2) Belgium BIPT's consultation on UWB
1) Japan MIC's consultation on frequency reorganization plan
On 30 September 2024, Japan MIC issued a consultation that seeks public opinion on its latest version of the frequency reorganization plan. Of possible interest to us include:
a) to consider expanded use of 5.2 GHz for WLAN
b) to consider the feasibility of frequency sharing of the use of narrowband devices in the 5925 MHz to 6425 MHz band
c) to consider the feasibility of outdoor WLAN operation in the 6 GHz, including the 6425 MHz to 7125 MHz as well as AFC.
A couple of 802.18 participants prepared a response with an opinion that commands the administration's effort. The draft response also encourages the administration to initiate authorization proceedings for standard power RLAN under supervision of AFC, and adopt the client-to-client communications as soon as possible.
The submission was reviewed and approved by IEEE 802.18 on 24 October 2024 with the following voting results: 12 Yes, 0 No, 1 Abstain.
Link to the draft response:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.18/dcn/24/18-24-0100-05-0000-proposed-repsonse-to-japan-mic-s-consultation-on-frequency-reorganization-plan-2024.pdf
Reference:
https://www.soumu.go.jp/menu_news/s-news/01kiban09_02000526.html
2) Belgium BIPT's consultation on UWB
On 3 October 2024, Belgium's telecom administration, BIPT, issued a consultation that seeks public opinions on radio interfaces related to devices using the ultra wideband technology (UWB). When compared with the existing technical conditions, this consultation proposes:
1) to modify a few existing rules (B20-01 to B20-11) for generic use of UWB to avoid redundancy;
2) to propose a new category (B23-14) concerning vehicle applications in the 6 GHz to 8.5 GHz band, including applications that involve infrastructure-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-vehicle communications;
3) to propose 12 new categories (B29-01 to B29-11) concerning specific applications involving fixed outdoor installations for specific radiodetermination, localization, tracing and data acquisition;
4) to propose a new category (B29-12) concerning specific applications involving enhanced indoor devices for specific radiodetermination, localization, tracing and data acquisition.
Similar to our previous approved response to Qatar CRA and Oman TRA, we prepared a response that commands the administration's effort and provides with the administration the latest progress of IEEE 802.15.4ab.
The submission was reviewed and approved by IEEE 802.18 on 24 October 2024 with the following voting results: 11 Yes, 1 No, 1 Abstain.
Link to the draft response:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.18/dcn/24/18-24-0102-02-0000-proposed-response-to-belgium-bipt-s-consultation-on-uwb-regulation.pdf
Reference:
https://www.bipt.be/operators/publication/consultation-on-radio-interfaces-related-to-devices-using-the-ultra-wideband-technology-uwb
Thanks and Regards,
EdwardTo unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1