stds-802-16: Recirculation Ballot #3a (TG1) Report
802.16 Recirculation Ballot #3a:
http://ieee802.org/16/tg1/ballots/ballot03/recirc3a.html
closed on 15 June.
The Vote Report:
http://ieee802.org/16/tg1/ballots/ballot03/vote_report_3a.html
shows no new Disapproves and 8 people changing from Disapprove
status. The approval ratio rose from 80% to 89.4%, well above the 75%
needed to pass.
The Comment Report (for use with Commentary):
http://ieee802.org/16/docs/01/80216-01_30.USR
includes 371 comments.
The TG1 Editorial Team <http://ieee802.org/16/tg1/editors.html> will
begin developing resolutions to these comments. TG1 expect to ask the
802 SEC at the July session for approval to move to Sponsor Ballot.
In preparation of the comment report, I discovered that I had
inadvertently omitted 32 comments from the Letter Ballot #3 database.
25 of these were actually resolved anyway because they were exact
duplicates of comments in the database (they were removed when I
accidentally deleted duplicate comments in processing). The other 7
[all Editorial or Non-binding] were not previously published.
To address this omission, I:
*included the found comments in the Recirc #3a Comment Report so that
they will be considered there.
*published a new version of the LB#3 comment database:
http://ieee802.org/16/docs/01/80216-01_19r3.zip
This includes the additional comments (numbers 1046-1077). Each is
marked "Submitted in LB#3, but accidentally left out of resolution
database."
*posted a PDF of the found comments:
http://ieee.sprintctl.net/groups/tg1/upload/80216-01_19add.pdf
I'm sorry for the earlier omission. Now that we are using Commentary
for both comment submission and comment processing, the chances of
such errors will be significantly smaller (but still nonzero).
Roger