Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAI] limiting fragmentation IEs to a single frame
Dan,
OK, I will consider to generate a comment in the next round.
Thanks.
Yunsong Yang
Huawei Device USA Inc.
10180 Telesis Court, STE 165
San Diego, CA 92121
Phone: +1-858-754-3638
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Harkins [mailto:dharkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 11:38 AM
To: Yangyunsong; STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: limiting fragmentation IEs to a single frame
Importance: High
Hi Yunsong,
Unfortunately the motion was made yesterday. If you feel there are some improvements to be made in the text please make a formal comment and we can address it.
regards,
Dan.
On 5/16/13 11:01 AM, "Yangyunsong" <yangyunsong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Hi Dan,
>
>If I may make a comment on the last sentence in section 8.4.2.1 before
>you motion r3:
>
>"If present, the Fragment IE appears after another Information element
>that it is fragmenting."
>
>#1. my understanding is that a Fragment IE can also follow another
>Fragment IE. The sentence above can be interpreted as conflicting with
>that.
>#2. "another" is grammatically wrong since there is "that..."
>describing the "Information element".
>
>So, I would like to suggest the following sentence to replace it:
>
>"If present, one or more Fragment IEs appear after the Information
>element that is being fragmented."
>
>Thank you.
>Yunsong Yang
>Huawei Device USA Inc.
>10180 Telesis Court, STE 165
>San Diego, CA 92121
>Phone: +1-858-754-3638
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: *** 802.11 TGai - Fast Initial Link Set-Up ***
>[mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dan Harkins
>Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 1:14 AM
>To: STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGAI] limiting fragmentation IEs to a single
>frame
>
> Hello,
>
> Discussion surrounding the adoption of 11-13/0478r2 requested a
>further clarification that fragmented IEs will be limited to a single frame.
>Since that 11-13/0478r2 has already been approved,
>11-13/0478r3 merely proposes the addition of a clarifying sentence to
>the already-adopted text about restricting fragment IEs to a single frame.
>
> Hopefully we can motion and adopt this tomorrow.
>
> regards,
>
> Dan.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>___
>_____
>
>IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your
>request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to
>communicate on the issues at hand.
>
>SELF SERVICE OPTION:
>Point your Browser to -
>http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then
>amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal
>from the reflector press the LEAVE button.
>
>Further information can be found at:
>http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html
>_______________________________________________________________________
>___
>_____
_______________________________________________________________________________
IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this
CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.
SELF SERVICE OPTION:
Point your Browser to - http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and
then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector
press the LEAVE button.
Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html
_______________________________________________________________________________