| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Ack – agreed. Thanks S From: Lei Wang [mailto:leiw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Thanks, Santosh, for the proposed resolutions. Regarding CID 1245, I would like to propose a different "Revised" resolution, as follows:
1.
Move the contents of Subsection 10.43 to a new subsection, 10.25.4;
2.
Move the contents of Subsection 10.44 to a new subsection, 10.25.5. The motivation of the above proposal is to put all the FILS feature descriptions under the subsection 10.25. What do you think about? Thanks. Lei -----Original Message----- Hi all, This is update on CIDs assigned to me for tomorrow morning (last one will have to be done later tomorrow or Wednesday morning)
1245 may need discussion. Santosh P. ======== 1365[[SP]] Accept - FILS indication element should be included in FILS discovery frames too
1245[[SP]] Revise - We cannot remove this as this is clause 10 - explaining behavior of how frames in clause 8 behave. Change second line of the second paragraph from "For each of the indicated domain names, the FILS element carries
a 2 octet hash of the network domain name and the IP address ... " to "For each of the indicated domain names, the FILS element shall carry a 2 octet hash of the network domain name and the IP address". XXXX first line of para does not make sense/incomplete
"For an AP supporting up to 7 network domains, the FILS indication element." 1068[[SP]] cant find this ??? 1454[[SP]] Accept 1411[[SP]] Revise - In subclause 10.25.1 - add following sentence at the end of the first paragraph, "FILS is only supported in infrastructure BSS. FILS is not supported in IBSS and MBSS." 1455[[SP]] working on it .. Thanks S -----Original Message----- From: *** 802.11 TGai - Fast Initial Link Set-Up *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc Emmelmann Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 5:31 AM To: STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGAI] Outstanding CIDs -- Assignment All: attached the suggested list of assignees per comment. Please note that your name may appear in several groups, so please scroll down 'till the very end of the mail even if you find your name right in the beginning. We will need to have contributions ready for discussion in the first TGai slot on Tuesday AM1. "Security Task Force" -- Dan, George Cherian, Rob Sun, Rene ================================================= 1255 1006 1334 1377 1256 1378 1249 1237 1394 1371 1395 1391 1388 1387 1384 1381 1379 1396 Please also have a look at the "ad-hoc notes column" in the tab. It contains some responses / suggested resolutions based on e-mail discussions presented to the group or provided as input for the face-to-face meeting. George Cherian: ============= 1382 Santosh P. ======== 1365[[SP]] - Accept - FILS indication element should be included in FILS discovery frames too
1245[[SP]] no new section required for FILS indication element - revise - We cannot remove this as this is clause 10 - explaining behavior of how frames in clause 8 behave. Change second line of the second paragraph from "For
each of the indicated domain names, the FILS element carries a 2 octet hash of the network domain name and the IP address ... " to "For each of the indicated domain names, the FILS element shall carry a 2 octet hash of the network domain name and the IP address".
XXXX first line of para does not make sense/incomplete "For an AP supporting up to 7 network domains, the FILS indication element."
1068[[SP]] cant find this ??? 1454[[SP]] Accept 1411[[SP]] Revise - In subclause 10.25.1 - add following sentence at the end of the first paragraph, "FILS is only supported in infrastructure BSS. FILS is not supported in IBSS and MBSS." 1455[[SP]] working on it .. George Calcev ============= 1271 1270 1268 1267 1266 1449 1448 1446 1418 Lei, Jarkko, George Cherian --> discussion of 11-13/718r2 ============================================ 1220 1142 1447 1446 Editor and Chairs to probe group's opinion ================================= 1079 -- discussion to move optional features into an annex _______________________________________________________________________________ IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand. SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to -
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button. Further information can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand. SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to -
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button. Further information can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________ IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand. SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to - http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button. Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________ |