| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
My responses are in
green. Thanks, Yunsong Yang Huawei Device USA Inc. 10180 Telesis Court, STE 165 San Diego, CA 92121 Phone: +1-858-754-3638 From: Mark Rison [mailto:m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx]
[Comments in red.] For CID 6495,
The commenter is of the opposite opinion of Adrian Stephens (CID 6012) regarding if we should describe a receiver’s behavior when receiving a non-compliant
frame. In San Antonio F2F meeting, the TG has indicated the preference of adopting resolution in CID 6012 regarding this point. Therefore, I recommend that resolution to CID 6495 be:
I'm fine with deleting the sentence (my concern was about the semantics of "neglect"). It should be a REVISED, not a REJECTED, though. YY> I am fine with “Revised”. For CID 6514,
First, there is a typo in the original text. There should be a space between “Info” and “ID”. Second, technically speaking, when the composite of the CAG is
changed (e.g. an Info ID is added, deleted, or changed), the CAG Number shall also be increased by 1 so that the STA may query the advertisement server to find out what has been changed. That is why “Info ID” should be kept. Therefore, I recommend that resolution
to CID 6514 be:
I don't think an Info ID is changed, it's the information carried in an ANQP-element identified by that Info ID which is changed, right? So I think a better resolution would be to make the sentence say simply: The CAG Version is incremented every time
YY> The intent of the original text is to indicate that any change in the value or the presence will cause the CAG Number to increase.
Now I noticed that “the presence” is already mentioned earlier in the sentence. So, I agree with you that “or Info ID” is redundant and should be removed. I will recommend that resolution to CID 6514 be “Accepted.”. Separately, the accepted resolution to CID
6884 will change “are” to “is”. So, that should satisfy you. Thanks. However, I would just like to check: deleting the "ANQP-" from "ANQP-element" to leave just "element", as in 14/1507, means that we're no longer talking about ANQP-elements (identified by Info ID) here but talking about what were called information elements (identified by Element ID). Is that correct? YY> The CAG Number doesn’t just apply to ANQP-element only. It has been extended to other advertisement protocols, such as PADP. So, the sentence
was made advertisement-protocol-neutral. However, the CAG Number doesn’t apply to regular information elements. In 11-14-1507r2, under 8.4.2.172, there is a sentence defining “The Common ANQP Advertisement Group (CAG) is a group of elements that are defined
by the same advertisement protocol”. Since no regular information elements are defined by any advertisement protocol, the TG thought it was clear enough.
Mark --
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600 Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601 ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk From: *** 802.11 TGai - Fast Initial Link Set-Up *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Yangyunsong Hi Marc and all, I just I just realize that I have been assigned to two comments.
For CID 6495,
The commenter is of the opposite opinion of Adrian Stephens (CID 6012) regarding if we should describe a receiver’s behavior when receiving a non-compliant
frame. In San Antonio F2F meeting, the TG has indicated the preference of adopting resolution in CID 6012 regarding this point. Therefore, I recommend that resolution to CID 6495 be:
For CID 6514,
First, there is a typo in the original text. There should be a space between “Info” and “ID”. Second, technically speaking, when the composite of the CAG is
changed (e.g. an Info ID is added, deleted, or changed), the CAG Number shall also be increased by 1 so that the STA may query the advertisement server to find out what has been changed. That is why “Info ID” should be kept. Therefore, I recommend that resolution
to CID 6514 be:
Thanks, Yunsong Yang Huawei Device USA Inc. 10180 Telesis Court, STE 165 San Diego, CA 92121 Phone: +1-858-754-3638 From: *** 802.11 TGai - Fast Initial Link Set-Up *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Marc Emmelmann Dear all:
_______________________________________________________________________________
IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.
SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to -
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button.
Further information can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________
IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand. SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to - http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button. Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________ |