Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBC] transfer CID 1270
Hitoshi,
thanks. Based in this discussion, I have set the resolution for CID 1063 to:
Revised:
Agree with the comment. At the same time, the text cited by the comment was deleted in D1.02 as a resolution to another comment. Therefore, no further changes are needed.
TGbc editor: No changes are needed to resolve this comment
Best,
Marc
> On 16 Apr 2021, at 06:34, Hitoshi MORIOKA <hmorioka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello Xiaofei, Stephen and all,
>
> I take CID 1270.
>
> CID 1063 seems already resolved in D1.02.
> Originally the commented part resolved for CID 1486.
> Similar comments, CID 1110 and 1271 were also resolved and the approved resolution for these CID is:
>
> --------
> Revised
>
> Agree with the comment. The text cited by the comment was deleted as a resolution to another comment. Therefore, no further changes are needed.
>
> TGbc editor: No changes are needed to resolve this comment
> --------
>
> I think this is good resolution for CID 1063.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> ---
> Hitoshi MORIOKA
> SRC Software Inc.
> hmorioka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>> 2021/04/16 6:24、Xiaofei Wang <Xiaofei.Wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>のメール:
>>
>> Also CID 1063 should be transferred to Morioka-san.
>>
>> 1063
>> Antonio DeLaOlivaDelgado
>> 9.4.2.300.2
>> 25
>> 19
>> T
>> Y
>> 25.00
>> 19
>> 9.4.2.300.2
>> Xiaofei Wang
>> The text "The Next eBCS Info frame subfield indicates the number of TBTTs until the next eBCS Info frame is transmitted. If the STA does not transmit eBCS Info frames, this subfield is not used."indicates that the Next eBCS Info frame subfield may not be used, and the field is optional but there is no bit in the control indicating if it is present or not. Another way would be to indicate that if the element is 1 byte long then the Nexst eBCS Info frame subfield is not present
>> As the comment indicate
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Xiaofei Clement Wang
>> Principal Engineer | InterDigital
>> T: (631) 622.4028
>> E: Xiaofei.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> From: Xiaofei Wang
>> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 17:23
>> To: Marc Emmelmann <marc.emmelmann@xxxxxx>; Hitoshi MORIOKA <hmorioka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: transfer CID 1270
>>
>> Dear Marc, Morioka-san and Mark,
>>
>> I think CID 1270 should be transferred to Morioka-san. I can help with wording if necessary.
>>
>> 1270
>> Mark RISON
>> 9.4.2.300.2
>> 25
>> 19
>> T
>> Y
>> 25.00
>> 19
>> 9.4.2.300.2
>> Xiaofei Wang
>> "number of TBTTs until" is not clear, e.g. is 0 ever used, or is it 1 to mean transmitted at the next TBTT? Also, eBCS Info frames are not generally transmitted at TBTTs, so there is a fractional ambiguity
>> Use baseline wording for similar cases to define a number of TBTTs; augment it with something to explain how transmissions after a TBTT are accounted for
>> Revised:
>> The cited text has been deleted.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Xiaofei Clement Wang
>> Principal Engineer | InterDigital
>> T: (631) 622.4028
>> E: Xiaofei.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBC&A=1
________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBC&A=1