| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi, Laurent: It’s not clear to me the intention of this SP. Can you answer/clarify the following? First, in MLD context/definition, we always use ‘link’ rather than channel or band. Second, what we will lose if without this SP? What choice does an EHT STA that is capable of operating in at least 2 bands have if it is not part of MLD? Third, if an device or interface (STA) is capable of operating in at least 2 channels, how would it claim this capability of dual band support if not operating as a MLD? A STA, even by design is capable of operating at 2 channels, it may conceal that capability to outside world. One cannot tell “can’t” or “won’t.” Thanks. Chunyu From: Cariou, Laurent <laurent.cariou@xxxxxxxxx> Hi all, Starting a thread for Q/A on doc 992 as we ran out of time. Feel free to ask your questions there, and refer to the SP# to which the question applies. Just posted below for reference the versions of SPs for SP1 discussed this morning:
Thanks, Laurent To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |