Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Parameters for EHT-MCSs

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hi all,

Thank you for the discussion during PHY teleconference call.

Based on the feedback, the attached shows some modification.

As for parameters in BPSK-DCM-DUP80 to be moved to 484-tone RU table, my personal view is since its BW is 80MHz, I guess readers are likely to be confused if it is included in 40MHz table. So as Youhan suggested, there is a separate table only for BPSK-DCM-DUP as TBD.

After group’s decision on how to indicate BPSK-DCM-DUP, I will finalize the document.

If there are any comments, please let me know.

Regards,

Yujin

From: Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 7:04 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Parameters for EHT-MCSs

Thank you, Rethna!

Regards,
Edward

On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 9:41 PM Rethna Pulikkoonattu <00000f243bb3caf2-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Yujin, Wook Bong and Edward,

As discussed, I've moved the MCS rate tables to the Appendix of 1338r4, with the annotation that, it is covered in 11-20/1290.

Regards,

Rethna

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:50 PM Yujin Noh <yujin.noh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi, Edward and Wook Bong.

I checked this out and found out there are content conflict as below.

What I thought was EHT Modulation and coding schemes correspond to 27.3.7 (HE modulation and coding schemes (HE-MCSs))

And Parameters for EHT-MCSs correspond to 27.5 (Parameters for HE-MCSs)

But Rethna’s document includes both together.

And if Rethna deletes all the tables and make a reference instead to the subclause in DCN 1290, then there would be no conflicts.

To Rethna,

Do you have any suggestions?

Regards,

Yujin

From: Wook Bong Lee <wookbong.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 3:40 PM
To: Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Yujin Noh <yujin.noh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; rethnakaran.pulikkoonattu@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Ruchen Duan <r.duan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Parameters for EHT-MCSs

Hi Yujin and Rethna,

I noticed that there are two PDTs on EHT-MCS..

24-Aug-2020 ET

2020

1290

0

TGbe

PDT-PHY-Parameters-for-EHT-MCSs

Yujin Noh (Newracom)

27-Aug-2020 17:12:20 ET

Download

27-Aug-2020 ET

2020

1338

1

TGbe

PDT-PHY-EHT Modulation and Coding (EHT-MCSs)

Rethna Pulikkoonattu (Broadcom)

27-Aug-2020 16:37:34 ET

Download

Both of them contain table…

Can you guys clarify this?

Also, I have several comments on 11-20/1338.

There are many texts which assume we have EHT SU and EHT ER SU. But we don’t have those PPDU format.

Moreover, I don’t recall agreement on MCS levels for EHT-SIG.

I have few more, but will wait for above discussion first.

Thanks.

Best regards,

Wook Bong Lee

From: Edward Au [mailto:edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 3:18 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Parameters for EHT-MCSs

Hello Yujin,

Thanks for this. I understand that there are similar but not exact contents in 20/1338r1 that contains more than 100 tables. May I know if it is possible to merge these two PDTs together?

Regards,

Edward

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 5:21 PM Yujin Noh <yujin.noh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi TTT and all,

I just uploaded draft text proposal for Parameters for EHT-MCSs as below

11-20/1290r0 PDT-PHY-Parameters-for-EHT-MCSs

Please let me know if you have any comments.

Regards,

Yujin

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1