I see your point. Yongho. That is really different. Basically, I assume the complete information of reporting STA is already included individually in EHT capa/operation IE (like legacy). Therefore, if we have one STA profile subelement, two links would be setup (i.e., more than one link). So, I’ve described “one or more” For STA profile subelement in r3, I also added “except for the reporting non-AP STA transmitting the (Re-)Association Request frame”. Thanks Best Regards Insun From: Yongho Seok [mailto:yongho.seok@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 2:29 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-MAC-MLO-multi-link-setup-usage-and-rules-of-ML-IE Aren't "more than one" and "one or more" different? Because we have different understanding, I suggest to have the exactly same sentence. Thanks for pointing it out. Yongho I see that part “more than one link” is captured in the second paragraph “The Multi-Link element carried in these frames shall include MLD-level information that is common to all STAs affiliated with the MLD and one or more STA profile subelement(s) including the specific information of the reported STA(s) corresponding to the link(s) according to the following rules. (Its sub-paragraphs are also mentioning like that) Do you happen to want it to be more clear by expressing it explicitly (more than one link)? Thanks Best Regards Insun From: Yongho Seok [mailto:yongho.seok@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 2:09 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-MAC-MLO-multi-link-setup-usage-and-rules-of-ML-IE My concern is that the following part is not clear in the PDT. 802.11be supports that a non-AP MLD may initiate multi-link setup with an AP MLD to setup more than one link with subset of APs affiliated with the AP MLD. This is for R1. [Motion 122, #SP133, [8] and [129]] Please let me know which wording is capturing "more than one link". Just including the motion passed text is more clear. Hi Yongho Thanks a lot for your comments I have received the same feedback as your comment. The motion says like “a non-AP MLD can request subset of APs in AP MLD to setup links” Therefore, to include the meaning of motion in r3, added the following: the reported non-AP STA, which is affiliated with the non-AP MLD, corresponding to the link that is requested for multi-link setup (Likewise, on AP MLD side) If you have further comments/concerns on that, please let me know. Thanks Best Regards Insun From: Yongho Seok [mailto:yongho.seok@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 1:34 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-MAC-MLO-multi-link-setup-usage-and-rules-of-ML-IE It seems that the following motion is not captured in your PDT. Could you add that sentence? 802.11be supports that a non-AP MLD may initiate multi-link setup with an AP MLD to setup more than one link with subset of APs affiliated with the AP MLD. This is for R1. [Motion 122, #SP133, [8] and [129]]
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |