Hi Insun,
Thank you for revising the PDT.
I have reviewed r5 and have a few comments.
Could you please take a look at the attached file?
Regards,
Abhi
From:
장인선 <insun.jang@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 2:17 AM
To: Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-MAC-MLO-multi-link-setup-usage-and-rules-of-ML-IE
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of
the organization.
Hi Abhi
Thanks for your further comments.
Please see my responses in the attached file.
I added some texts resolving your comments to describe the motions explicitly.
Thanks
Best Regards
Insun
---------- Original Message ----------
From : Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To : STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date : 2020/09/09 15:12:54 [GMT+09:00]
Subject : Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-MAC-MLO-multi-link-setup-usage-and-rules-of-ML-IE
Hi Insun,
Thank you for revising the PDT doc.
I have reviewed r4 and I still feel the doc doesn’t cover all the motions.
Could you please take a look at the attached file containing my embedded comments?
Regards,
Abhi
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
Hi Abhi
Thanks for your comments.
The attached file I sent includes responses only.
You can see r3 resolving your previous comments, which was uploaded
Please take a look at r3.
Thanks
Best Regards
Insun
---------- Original Message ----------
From : Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To : STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date : 2020/09/09 05:17:20 [GMT+09:00]
Subject : Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-MAC-MLO-multi-link-setup-usage-and-rules-of-ML-IE
Hi Insun,
Thank you for preparing the PDT.
I have embedded several comments in the attached doc. Could you please take a careful look?
I noticed that some of the motions are not yet covered (or completely covered) in the doc. It will be good if you could please cite the corresponding motion for the proposed text.
Regards,
Abhi
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
Hi Yongho
Thanks. I’m
going to try to reflect your suggestion on r4.
Thanks
Best Regards
Insun
From: Yongho Seok [mailto:yongho.seok@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 4:46 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-MAC-MLO-multi-link-setup-usage-and-rules-of-ML-IE
Thanks for your explanation.
With your assumption, we can consider the current PDT has included that motion. But, it is just an assumption and that is not agreed yet.
So, to avoid misunderstanding, I kindly suggest to include the same motion text in the next revision.
I see your point. Yongho. That is really different.
Basically, I assume the complete information of reporting STA is already included individually in EHT capa/operation IE (like legacy).
Therefore, if we have one STA profile subelement, two links would be setup (i.e., more than one link). So, I’ve described “one or more”
For STA profile subelement in r3, I also added “except for the reporting non-AP STA transmitting the (Re-)Association Request frame”.
Thanks
Best Regards
Insun
From: Yongho Seok [mailto:yongho.seok@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 2:29 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-MAC-MLO-multi-link-setup-usage-and-rules-of-ML-IE
Aren't "more than one" and "one or more" different?
Because we have different understanding, I suggest to have the exactly same sentence.
Thanks for pointing it out. Yongho
I see that part “more than one link” is captured in the second paragraph
“The Multi-Link element carried in these frames shall include MLD-level information that is common to all STAs affiliated with the MLD and
one or more STA profile subelement(s) including the specific information of the reported
STA(s) corresponding to the link(s) according to the following rules.
(Its sub-paragraphs are also mentioning like that)
Do you happen to want it to be more clear by expressing it explicitly (more than one link)?
Thanks
Best Regards
Insun
From: Yongho Seok [mailto:yongho.seok@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 2:09 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-MAC-MLO-multi-link-setup-usage-and-rules-of-ML-IE
My concern is that the following part is not clear in the PDT.
802.11be supports that a non-AP MLD may initiate multi-link setup with an AP MLD to setup
more than one link with subset of APs
affiliated with the AP MLD. This is for R1.
[Motion 122, #SP133, [8] and [129]]
Please let me know which wording is capturing "more than one link". Just including the motion passed text is more clear.
Hi Yongho
Thanks a lot for your comments
I have received the same feedback as your comment.
The motion says like “a non-AP MLD can request subset of APs in AP MLD to setup links”
Therefore, to include the meaning of motion in r3, added the following:
the reported non-AP STA, which is affiliated with the non-AP MLD, corresponding to the link that is requested for multi-link setup (Likewise, on AP MLD side)
If you have further comments/concerns on that, please let me know.
Thanks
Best Regards
Insun
From: Yongho Seok [mailto:yongho.seok@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 1:34 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-MAC-MLO-multi-link-setup-usage-and-rules-of-ML-IE
It seems that the following motion is not captured in your PDT. Could you add that sentence?
802.11be supports that
a non-AP MLD may initiate multi-link setup with an AP MLD to
setup more than one link
with subset of APs affiliated with the AP MLD.
This is for R1.
[Motion 122, #SP133, [8] and [129]]
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1