Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: D0.1 draft principle and deadline discussion

Hi Alfred,

 

Thanks Chair for the detailed replies and clarifications.

 

regards

于健 Ross Yu

Huawei Technologies

 

发件人: Alfred Asterjadhi [mailto:asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2020年9月12日 7:54
收件人: Yujian (Ross Yu) <ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx>
抄送: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: Re: D0.1 draft principle and deadline discussion

 

Hi Ross,

 

Thanks for checking on this item and appreciate the efforts of the POC, TTTs and the reviewers to improve the quality of the document. 

 

The expectation is to have the proposed draft texts inline with the passed motions. Hence, it is natural to expect that the proposed text will contain certain TBDs since certain parts of the design will not have a motion in the current SFD. 

Document 1276 is currently scheduled to be in the queue for Monday's PHY conference call so that PHY members can continue improving the text and reach consensus and then run a SP for it to be included in the candidate draft. Obviously e-mail feedback via the reflector is also very much appreciated to use the time allocated in the conf call efficiently. 

 

As of now there is no plan to postpone the milestone for TGbe D0.1 and I appreciate all the efforts that TGbe members are putting to complete such a task. 

We have currently scheduled an item on Thursday's Joint conf call to go over the status of the PDTs and make a decision as a group based on the progress made at that time.

 

Best Regards,

 

Alfred

 

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:41 PM Yujian (Ross Yu) <ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Alfred and all,

 

During today’s call, when I try to run SP on PDT-PHY-EHT-preamble-EHT-SIG (20-1276r4), there are some commenters saying there are many TBDs in the section, and want to delay the SP until more technical contributions are discussed. I assume this will make this section fail to meet the deadline of D0.1.

 

All TTTs including myself spent a lot of time writing the text according to the passed motion in the SFD and try our best to meet the group’s deadline of D0.1. And my understanding is it is fine to have TBDs in D0.1 as long as it aligns with the passed motions. I am OK to defer the SPs if the group decides the deadline is changed to a later time. And I also welcome people to point out which part need to be made to yellow (TBD), and I can make the changes accordingly before I run the SP.

 

So do we want to delay D0.1 and have more technical discussions to make D0.1 more compact? Or we still prioritize PDT to try our best to meet the D0.1 deadline? I’d like to have a discussion or hear your opinions. Thanks.

 

regards

于健 Ross Yu

Huawei Technologies

 


 

--

Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD

IEEE802.11 TGbe Chair,

Qualcomm Technologies Inc.

Cell #:    +1 858 263 9445

Office #: +1 858 658 5302

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1