Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Comments on CR doc 22/1890r1

Hi Binita,

 

Sorry for my delayed respond.

I’m fine with the “AP Removal Timer” suggested by you.

 

As to your question - The reason for the “Expected” is that this timer is used when the AP has not been removed yet (but only expected to be removed).

 

However, as said above, I’m fine with your suggestion.

 

 

Regards,

Arik

 

From: Binita Gupta <00001d96db2c011d-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: יום ה 17 נובמבר 2022 17:52
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Comments on CR doc 22/1890r1

 

Hi Arik,

 

How about just renaming it to “AP Removal Timer” to keep it concise?

 

Thanks,

Binita

 

From: Binita Gupta <00001d96db2c011d-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2022 12:58 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Comments on CR doc 22/1890r1

 

Hi Arik, Thanks for the feedback. Since you and Yongho have objection on rejecting CID 12604, I am ok to rename the ‘Delete Timer’ field. I wanted to ask you why do you have ‘Expected’ in the field name? Are you ok to calling it ‘Affiliated

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

Hi Arik,

 

Thanks for the feedback.

Since you and Yongho have objection on rejecting CID 12604, I am ok to rename the ‘Delete Timer’ field.

 

I wanted to ask you why do you have ‘Expected’ in the field name? Are you ok to calling it ‘Affiliated AP Removal Timer”?

 

Thanks,

Binita

 

 

From: Arik Klein <arik.klein@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 7:30 PM
To: Binita Gupta <binitagupta@xxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Comments on CR doc 22/1890r1

 

Hi Binita, Thanks for your presentation. As to CID 12604 – Similar to Yongho’s concern, I do not see a real technical reason to reject this comment which simply asking to designate a name for the field that will be adequate to the content of

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

Hi Binita,

 

Thanks for your presentation.

 

As to CID 12604 – Similar to Yongho’s concern, I  do not see a real technical reason to reject this comment which simply asking to designate a name for the field that will be adequate to the content of the field, as specified in the comment.

 

Please consider to revise the comment as proposed.

 

Regards,

Arik

 

From: Binita Gupta <00001d96db2c011d-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: יום ה 17 נובמבר 2022 09:51
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Comments on CR doc 22/1890r1

 

Hi All,

 

I presented CR doc 22/1890r1 in today’s TGbe AM1 session.

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/22/11-22-1890-01-00be-lb266-cr-for-reconfiguration-ml-element.docx

 

Following CIDs were deferred.

10567   13480   13759   13762   11042   11401   11520   12604   13263              13264   13481   13760

 

Please share your comments/feedback on these CIDs in this thread.

 

Thanks,

Binita

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1