| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Arik, Thanks for your comment. I have revised the resolution for CID 12604 in 22/1890r2 to rename “Delete Timer” to “AP Removal Timer” (see in attached). Also, I have revised resolution for following CIDs based on feedback received during the call and offline.
All, Please let me know if you have any further comments on this CR doc. Thanks, Binita From: Arik Klein <arik.klein@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Binita, Sorry for my delayed respond. I’m fine with the “AP Removal Timer” suggested by you. As to your question - The reason for the “Expected” is that this
timer is used when the AP has not been removed yet (but only expected to be removed).
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Hi Binita, Sorry for my delayed respond. I’m fine with the “AP Removal Timer” suggested by you. As to your question - The reason for the “Expected” is that this timer is used when the AP has not been removed yet (but only expected to be removed). However, as said above, I’m fine with your suggestion. Regards, Arik From: Binita Gupta <00001d96db2c011d-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Arik, How about just renaming it to “AP Removal Timer” to keep it concise? Thanks, Binita From: Binita Gupta <00001d96db2c011d-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Arik, Thanks for the feedback. Since you and Yongho have objection on rejecting CID 12604, I am ok to rename the ‘Delete Timer’ field. I wanted to ask you why
do you have ‘Expected’ in the field name? Are you ok to calling it ‘Affiliated ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Hi Arik, Thanks for the feedback. Since you and Yongho have objection on rejecting CID 12604, I am ok to rename the ‘Delete Timer’ field. I wanted to ask you why do you have ‘Expected’ in the field name? Are you ok to calling it ‘Affiliated AP Removal Timer”? Thanks, Binita From: Arik Klein <arik.klein@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Binita, Thanks for your presentation. As to CID 12604 – Similar to Yongho’s concern, I do not see a real technical reason to reject this comment which simply
asking to designate a name for the field that will be adequate to the content of
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Hi Binita, Thanks for your presentation. As to CID 12604 – Similar to Yongho’s concern, I do not see a real technical reason to reject this comment which simply asking to designate a name for the field that will be adequate to the
content of the field, as specified in the comment. Please consider to revise the comment as proposed. Regards, Arik From: Binita Gupta <00001d96db2c011d-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi All, I presented CR doc 22/1890r1 in today’s TGbe AM1 session.
Following CIDs were deferred. 10567 13480 13759 13762 11042 11401 11520 12604 13263 13264 13481 13760 Please share your comments/feedback on these CIDs in this thread. Thanks, Binita To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |
Attachment:
11-22-1890-02-00be-LB266 CR for Reconfiguration ML element.docx
Description: 11-22-1890-02-00be-LB266 CR for Reconfiguration ML element.docx