[STDS-802-11-TGBE] Two more volunteers needed // Re: Clarification - Re: Volunteers needed to review my roll-in with respect to baseline (11me D2.0)

[Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear 802.11be members,

Thank you very much for your support.  

As of now, I still need two more volunteers who can help me review the text alignment with IEEE 802.11REVme D2.0 (which is expected to be ready in late February).  Please refer to the table below.

Clauses 1 and 3	Stephen McCann
Clause 4	Atsushi Shirakawa
Clause 5	Carol Ansley
Clauses 7 and 8	Bo Sun
Clause 9	Jinyoung Chun Binita Gupta
Clause 10	Liuming Lu Gaurang Naik Akira Kishida
Clause 11	Michail Koundourakis Rubayet Shafin
Clause 12	Mike Montemurro Gaurav Patwardhan
Clause 13	Sunhee Baek Peshal Nayak
Clause 17	Rui Yang
Clause 26	Chunyu Hu
Annex B, E, R	John Wullert
Annex C
Annex Z	Rui Yang
Annex AA

Regards,

Edward 

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:58 AM Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear 802.11be members,

For the review with respect to the baseline (11me D2.0), it is different from the review of my roll-in of the approved comment resolution documents.

As I reported in one of the previous Editor's reports, our texts from Clauses 1 to 13, Clause 17, and Clause 26 are written based on different versions of the REVme draft.  From time to time, we need to make sure that these texts are updated and matched with the latest version of the REVme draft.

Now, I have completed the roll-in of the approved comment resolution documents, I will start aligning our text with the REVme draft, which will take at least a few days especially since I need to compare the text not only line by line, but also word by word, and make sure the figures (especially in Clause 9) are updated.  (NOTE - It is a relatively painful process, IMHO)

For your review, I will need your help to check whether my update matches with the texts in REVme D2.0.  It can take you a few hours to review and find any discrepancies.  If you volunteered before reading this clarification email but you believe you do not have the bandwidth to do the review, I totally understand it and please feel free to send me an offline email to opt out.

As of now, I still need a few volunteers to help.

Thanks and Regards,
Edward

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:20 AM Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear 802.11be members,

In the next few weeks, I will not only roll-in the approved proposed resolution, but also update the texts of clauses 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17, and 26 with respect to the baseline, which is 11me D2.0.

May I know if you are interested in spending about a few hours to review my text and see if I miss any update?  I expect to send you a draft to review in late January/early February.

Clauses 1 and 3:  I need one volunteer

Clause 4:  I need one volunteer

Clause 5:  I need one volunteer

Clauses 7 and 8:  I need one volunteer

Clause 9:  I need at least two volunteers

Clause 10:  I need at least two volunteers

Clause 11:  I need at least two volunteers

Clause 12:  I need at least two volunteers

Clause 13:  I need at least two volunteers

Clause 17:  I need one volunteer

Clause 26:  I need one volunteer

For Clause 6, I will sync-up with REVme Editors (Emily and myself...) and our TG Chair, Alfred, first and I will keep all of you posted..

Regards,
Edward

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1