Hi Edward,
I can volunteer for Annex AA.
regards
于健 Ross Jian Yu
Huawei Technologies
发件人: Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx>
发送时间: 2023年2月6日
14:21
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Two more volunteers needed // Re: Clarification - Re: Volunteers needed to review my roll-in with respect to baseline (11me D2.0)
Thank you very much for your support.
As of now, I still need two more volunteers who can help me review the text alignment with IEEE 802.11REVme D2.0 (which is expected to be ready in late February). Please
refer to the table below.
|
Clauses 1 and 3
|
Stephen McCann
|
|
Clause 4
|
Atsushi Shirakawa
|
|
Clause 5
|
Carol Ansley
|
|
Clauses 7 and 8
|
Bo Sun
|
|
Clause 9
|
Jinyoung Chun
Binita Gupta
|
|
Clause 10
|
Liuming Lu
Gaurang Naik
Akira Kishida
|
|
Clause 11
|
Michail Koundourakis
Rubayet Shafin
|
|
Clause 12
|
Mike Montemurro
Gaurav Patwardhan
|
|
Clause 13
|
Sunhee Baek
Peshal Nayak
|
|
Clause 17
|
Rui Yang
|
|
Clause 26
|
Chunyu Hu
|
|
Annex B, E, R
|
John Wullert
|
|
Annex C
|
|
|
Annex Z
|
Rui Yang
|
|
Annex AA
|
|
For the review with respect to the baseline (11me D2.0), it is different from the review of my roll-in of the approved comment resolution documents.
As I reported in one of the previous Editor's reports, our texts from Clauses 1 to 13, Clause 17, and Clause 26 are written based on different versions of the REVme draft.
From time to time, we need to make sure that these texts are updated and matched with the latest version of the REVme draft.
Now, I have completed the roll-in of the approved comment resolution documents, I will start aligning our text with the REVme draft, which will take at least a few days
especially since I need to compare the text not only line by line, but also word by word, and make sure the figures (especially in Clause 9) are updated. (NOTE - It is a relatively painful process, IMHO)
For your review, I will need your help to check whether my update matches with the texts in REVme D2.0. It can take you a few hours to review and find any discrepancies.
If you volunteered before reading this clarification email but you believe you do not have the bandwidth to do the review, I totally understand it and please feel free to send me an offline email to opt out.
As of now, I still need a few volunteers to help.
Thanks and Regards,
Edward
In the next few weeks, I will not only roll-in the approved proposed resolution, but also update the texts of clauses 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17, and 26 with
respect to the baseline, which is 11me D2.0.
May I know if you are interested in spending about a few hours to review my text and see if I miss any update? I expect to send you a draft to review in late January/early
February.
Clauses 1 and 3: I need one volunteer
Clause 4: I need one volunteer
Clause 5: I need one volunteer
Clauses 7 and 8: I need one volunteer
Clause 9: I need at least two volunteers
Clause 10: I need at least two volunteers
Clause 11: I need at least two volunteers
Clause 12: I need at least two volunteers
Clause 13: I need at least two volunteers
Clause 17: I need one volunteer
Clause 26: I need one volunteer
For Clause 6, I will sync-up with REVme Editors (Emily and myself...) and our TG Chair, Alfred, first and I will keep all of you posted..
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
|