Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Discussion on TID suggestion from AP to STA in SCS Response (doc 11-24-350)

Hi All,

One more point to add here from baseline. 

I was looking at the MSCS feature in REVme D5.0 and i see that for MSCS AP can recommend a different set of parameters in the MSCS Descriptor element in a rejected MSCS Response, and that can include suggesting a different UP/TID to be used for a subsequent MSCS Request from the STA. There is no restriction and AP is allowed to suggest a different User Priority Bitmap or User Priority Limit in the MSCS Response. Given that this is already supported for MSCS, it is all the more reason to enable this for SCS as well.

image.png
image.png

image.png

image.png
 
Thanks,
Binita

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 8:58 AM Binita Gupta <bingupta.ieee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Dibakar,

Thank you for starting this thread for this CID.

As I also commented, AP should be able to suggest a different TID in the SCS Response if the TID in the SCS Request does not align with the policy on the AP side. And instead of just rejecting  it is better that AP can suggest a TID so that STA can know why the request failed and can take corrective action. I agree with you that this is informational and STA can benefit from knowing why the request was rejected.  

We haven't received any member responses raising concerns on this. I hope members can align on this proposed resolution this time. This was also discussed in the last round as part of my CR doc 23/1540r5.

Others, please share your thoughts on this so we can resolve this.

Thanks,
Binita


On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 1:59 PM Das, Dibakar <dibakar.das@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi all,

 

Thanks for the good discussion on CID 22024 yesterday.

 

22024

35.17

658.48

In the AP suggested QoS Characteristics element in the SCS Response, the UP and TID fields may also be different from the corresponding values in the requested SCS stream, e.g. in the case when the requested UP/TID does not align with the policy on the AP.

Modify text to indicate that UP or TID fields may also differ in the SCS Response.

Revised.

 

Added TID to the list as well. Since UP = TID in the current spec, this also applies to change in UP.

 

TGbe editor: please make changes tagged by CID #22024 in 11-24/0350r0.

 

 

Please let me know your thoughts on how to resolve this.

 

Personally, I think since this is informational, the STA could benefit from knowing why AP rejected its request.

 

Regards,

Dibakar

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1