In view of Marks comments, I made slight changes at the beginning of 12.2.12.1. to make clear both device ID and PASN ID go together.
See what you think.
Graham
From: G Smith
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 11:22 AM
To: li.yan16@xxxxxxxxxx; stds-802-11-tgbh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: a minor technical issue in PASN ID contribution
Hi Li Yan,
Great.
Attached please find r8 with a couple of very minor edits.
I added the location reference (editor instruction) at 12.2.12.1
I removed the brackets from “(sub) element” to be “subelement”
Deleted a space
I added comments so you can find them easily.
I am OK with this proposal, well done.
Graham
From:
li.yan16@xxxxxxxxxx <li.yan16@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 10:59 PM
To: stds-802-11-tgbh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; G Smith <gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: a minor technical issue in PASN ID contribution
Hi Graham and other members,
I'v uploaded 789r8 based on the discussion of the last meeting. Basically most are related to the editorial changes and to keep consistent with CR for CID
3122 about the length of device ID status(0 or 1).
The only technical issue is as following(i.e., use 'may' or 'shall' ):
Basically i'm not sure which one should be used, so in the previous revision i just used the word 'may'(my intention is that we can have more discussion if anyone has different idea
about this). However, Graham points out it should be 'shall' and i totally agree with it.
I also want to see if other members have different opinion on this.
Additionally, cloud you please check the new revision to see if it's good for you, Graham ?🙂
Best Regards！
李炎 Li
Yan
标准预研工程师 Standard
Development Engineer
架构团队/有线规划部/有线产品经营部 Architecture Team/Wireline Product Planning Dept/Wireline Product Operation
|
|
ZTE Corporation,50 Software Avenue, Yuhuatai District, Nanjing, P.R.China, 210012 T:
+86 755 xxxxxxxx F:+86 15850568971 |
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBH list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBH&A=1