| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
SP1:
Do you agree to define an optional mechanism in 802.11bn which allows for communication of relevant ECN information from IPv4/v6 header (TOS/Traffic Class fields), using MAC/MLME-SAP facilities, to aid in QoS handling (e.g. for L4S classification) of traffic flows by the MAC layer of an AP STA?
NOTE 1 – The exact mechanism is TBD.
Supporting documents: 24/0399, 24/0384, 24/0818 (update 11/08)
SP2:
Do you agree to define an optional mechanism in 802.11bn which allows the MAC layer of an AP STA to indicate, to higher layers at the MAC/MLME-SAP boundary, the condition of congestion experienced (at or below MAC layer) to facilitate appropriate ECN markings by upper layers for IPv4/v6 packets?
NOTE 1 – The exact mechanism is TBD.
NOTE 2 – Criteria to determine the condition of congestion experienced is left to implementation and is therefore considered to be out of scope.
Supporting documents: 24/0399, 24/0384, 24/0818 (update 11/08)
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1