Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi You-Wei, I have a few questions on your document 681r1. Page 21, [CID#3290, shift to below figure 37-3] In UHR Co-BF sequential sounding sequence, to collect all the required the channel state to compute a steering matrix for [CID#862] Why Figure 37-4 for joint NDP sounding sequence follows the description for sequential sounding sequence? Should "[CID#3290] An example of a UHR [CID#920] Co-BF [M#375] The term UHR Co-BF beamformer refers to a MU beamformer. The term UHR Co-BF beamformee refers to a MU beamformee. A UHR Co-BF beamformee only supports full bandwidth MU feedback. I think UHR Co-BF beam former is more than a MU beam former, which can do cross BSS sounding. I am not sure "A UHR Co-BF beamformee only supports full bandwidth MU feedback” is accurate. If MU beamformee supports both full bandwidth and partial bandwidth MU feedback, it still can be a UHR Co-BF beamformee. I think it is better to use "A UHR Co-BF beamformee is only required to support full bandwidth MU feedback”. Thanks Yan
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |