Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hello Joseph, Thank you for your feedback on CID 1304.
It appears that this comment requires more discussion. I will remove it from the “Review” and bring it to TGmd for “Discussion”.
Regards, Emily Hi Emily – Regarding the resolution for CID 1304: I don’t believe there is a requirement to use PIFS to initiate a CAP, as any IFS which will allow the media to be gained will do. There is a requirement that if the media is not regained at the end of the TXOP within a PIFS that the CAP
is over, but this requirement does not apply to the initial gaining of the media. Hence, I think the error was the use of PIFS which should have simply been IFS. Hence, I think the resolution should be: REVISED at 162.36, change "an interframe space (PIFS)" to "an interframe space (IFS)". But, after some additional thought I don’t understand why the detail of sensing the channel to be idle for an IFS is even necessary. While it might be helpful to define when
the CAP begins and when it ends, i.e. when the media is gained and when it is released, I think it will overly complicate the definition and doesn’t seem necessary. Hence I propose that the definition should read: controlled access phase (CAP):
A time period during which the hybrid coordinator (HC) maintains control of the medium. It might span multiple consecutive transmission opportunities (TXOPs) and can contain polled TXOPs. Regards,
Joseph From: ***** 802.11 REVm - Revision Maintainance List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Qi, Emily H --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hello Dorothy and all, I have uploaded the following document with proposed comment resolutions for the EDITOR ad hoc:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/18/11-18-0657-00-000m-revmd-wg-lb232-comments-for-editor-ad-hoc.xls. 72 editorial comments are addressed in the tab “Review”. Please review and let me know if you have any question. I plan to have a motion to approve those comment resolutions (72 “easy” editorial comments) in the May IEEE meeting if there
is no further question. Regards, Emily Qi To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1 |