Regards,
Hello Edward,
For your comments on CIDs 1168, 1172, 1173, 1121, 1178, 1186, 1220, 1568, 1230, and 1269, I've updated my resolution and you would refer to 18/0619r5 (https://mentor.ieee.org/802.
11/dcn/18/11-18-0619-05-000m- ) for the changes.revmd-editor2-lb232-comments. xlsx
For CID 1121, why are the three instances being changed to
"with dot11[blah] equal to [true/false]" but the others
being changed to "with dot11[blah] [true/false]"?
And are you fixing "whose dot11MCCAActivated values also are true)"
(to "with dot11MCCAActivated also true)") in 9.6.16.6,
and all the "whose dot11[blah] is true" to "with dot11[blah]
true"? "whose dot11" gives me 22 hits.
For CID 1568, are you sure "AP/PCP" is "AP and PCP" not
"AP or PCP"?
For your comment on CID 1118, I believe we do not need to delete "successful ___" in all of the 35 findings. For example, there is a definition of "successful transmission" in clause 3.2 that I do not believe we have to consider the change. How about I assign this CID to you for further review/proposed change?
Probably best to leave for now and I can bring in D2.0.
Thanks,
Mark
Note: Pursuant to the notice at the end of this email, this email
is addressed to everyone involved in 802.11 work, and does
not contain protected information. Full dissemination,
distribution, copying and use is authorised.
--
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français
Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600
Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601
ROYAUME UNI
WWW: http://www.samsung.com/uk
From: Edward Au [mailto:edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx
]
Sent: 02 May 2018 06:53
To: Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGM] Updated EDITOR2 comment spreadsheet with two motion tabs (18/0619r4)
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your review.
For your comments on CIDs 1168, 1172, 1173, 1121, 1178, 1186, 1220, 1568, 1230, and 1269, I've updated my resolution and you would refer to 18/0619r5 (https://mentor.ieee.org/802.
11/dcn/18/11-18-0619-05-000m- ) for the changes.revmd-editor2-lb232-comments. xlsx
For your comments on CIDs 1231 and 1232, I've added a comment to Editor/Editor2 to make sure that there is a non-broken space between 1316 and B. You would refer to 18/0619r5 for the comment too.
For your comment on CID 1118, I believe we do not need to delete "successful ___" in all of the 35 findings. For example, there is a definition of "successful transmission" in clause 3.2 that I do not believe we have to consider the change. How about I assign this CID to you for further review/proposed change?
Regards,
Edward
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 6:16 AM, Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for these, Edward. I have the following comments on the EDITOR2-A tab:
CID
Comment
1168
also at 1188.38 and "a MCCA" at 569.20
1172
also at 1401.37
1173
also at 629.50
1121
there are 19 or so instances in other subclauses
1178
not 2860.26 or 2865.25, that's a field not a parameter
1186
also "a SU or MU MIMO
transmission" in 23.3.8.2.2.2.3 and about 23 instances of "a SU transmission"1118
I get about 35 hits for "successful rece"
1220
not a bracket but a close ceil operator
1568
note F11-22 also has "non-AP/non-PCP" that needs fixing, and also "AP/PCP" ditto. Also "PCP/AP" in 6.3.92.2.3, "HC/PCP" in 11.4.4.4
1230
don't lose the article "the" (IEEE shouldn't mimic the WFA's illiteracy!)
1231
make sure it's a NBSP (not clear in proposed change)
1232
make sure it's a NBSP (not clear in proposed change)
1269
also dot11RSNConfigDLCGroup in 12.12.2.4.2
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français
Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600
Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601
ROYAUME UNI
WWW: http://www.samsung.com/uk
From: ***** 802.11 REVm - Revision Maintainance List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGM@ieee.
org ] On Behalf Of Edward Au
Sent: 01 May 2018 06:59
To: STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGM] Updated EDITOR2 comment spreadsheet with two motion tabs (18/0619r4)
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hi all,
I've uploaded revision 4 of the REVmd EDITOR2 ad-hoc comment spreadsheet at:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/18/11-18-0619-04-000m- revmd-editor2-lb232-comments. xlsx
Similar to the EDITOR ad-hoc comment spreadsheet prepared by Emily, I've created the following two tabs:
[1] "Motion-EDITOR2-A" includes proposed comment resolutions for obvious editorial comments in the EDITOR2 ad-hoc;
[2] "Motion-EDITOR2-B" includes proposed comment resolutions for 24 editorial comments in the EDITOR2 ad-hoc that were discussed in the April ad-hoc.
Please review and let me know if you have any comment.
Regards,
Edward
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-
bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM& A=1
