CID 6221 says that
The FR<n> items generally just refer to Clause 9 -- this should be more specific
In a TGme session during the September F2F, one point of view was that one should not refer to C9
subclauses at all, as it's not clear what it means to be able to receive a certain frame type.
Another point of view was that references should be given to C10 or C11 instead
Here is an instance of the issue (note FR stands for "frame reception"):
If you have any thoughts on what the right answer is here, please
do put them forward here, in advance of the Honolulu F2F!
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français
Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600
Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601
ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1