Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11] Draft spectrum statement motion on RR-TAG Weekly teleconference tomorrow

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---
To address (1) We should delete "recently".  The statement remains correct.  As to (2) we make this quite clear elsewhere.  (3)  I don't see that the need for extra words, but your revised version is (mostly) a true statement.  It would be better without "recently allocated" to avoid revisiting what "allocated" means and also to avoid debating if 3 years ago is "recently".  We had "allowed" instead of "allocated" for a good reason. 
Otherwise I guess it's fine. 


 

From: Vijay Auluck <auluck.vijay@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 4:56 PM
To: 'Benjamin Rolfe' <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11] Draft spectrum statement motion on RR-TAG Weekly teleconference tomorrow
 

Hi Ben,


Yes, you are correct that ‘the band’ in question is not yet allocated in every country, and based on my experience it may take years to achieve that. Here are a few points for consideration:

 

  1. The current version is not clear to me which states….”including recently the 6 GHz…”. The sentence may be incomplete!
  2. I think my suggestion may even encourage administrations to start looking into opening the band.
  3. Another way to address your point is to add further clarity by saying,  “….including the recently allocated 6 GHz band (5925 MHz to 7250 MHz) in the U.S. and other countries, where significant deployments are underway.”

 

Cheers!

Vijay

 

From: Benjamin Rolfe <outlook_2CB8745B51AA14EB@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Benjamin Rolfe
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 4:06 PM
To: STDS-802-11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Vijay Auluck <auluck.vijay@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11] Draft spectrum statement motion on RR-TAG Weekly teleconference tomorrow

 

Here's my problem with the change:  "recently allocated" is not true world-wide.  As is it is true: 802.11 defines channelization for the band.  We are advocating changes to allow 802.11 in the frequency range in those regions were it is not yet allowed.  It is technically correct as is and not so much with that change. 

FWIW

Ben

From: Vijay Auluck <auluck.vijay@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 12:45 PM
To: STDS-802-11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11] Draft spectrum statement motion on RR-TAG Weekly teleconference tomorrow

 

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---

All,

 

My suggested edits are in the attached document, and below:


I would like the sentence…“IEEE 802.11 supports operation in several bands,[1] including recently the 6 GHz (5925 MHz to 7250 MHz) band with significant deployments underway.”

 

to read “IEEE 802.11 supports operation in several bands,[2] including the recently allocated 6 GHz band (5925 MHz to 7250 MHz) where significant deployments are underway.”

 

Vijay

 

From: Dorothy Stanley <dstanley1389@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 9:16 AM
To: STDS-802-11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11] Draft spectrum statement motion on RR-TAG Weekly teleconference tomorrow

 

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---

Hello Amelia,

 

Thank you for the improved draft.

I have some further suggestions in the attached document.

 

Best,

 

Dorothy

----------------------
Dorothy Stanley
IEEE 802.11 WG Chair, dstanley@xxxxxxxx
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
dorothy.stanley@xxxxxxx
dstanley1389@xxxxxxxxx
+1 630-363-1389

 

 

On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 7:05 AM Amelia Andersdotter <amelia.ieee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---

Dear all,

After work in the IEEE 802.18 ISUS Ad-hoc and subsequent discussions on
the .18 reflector, and two .18 weekly teleconferences, and offline
discussions with the major contributors to the final text, we're at the
point where the draft spectrum statement is ready to be motioned.

The rev12 of document 18/23-0015 is posted on the .18 mentor:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.18/dcn/23/18-23-0015-12-ISUS-isus-clean-version-of-spectrum-statement.docx


Thank you to all people who have participated and improved this document
until this point,

best regards,

--
^\...~...~...~...~...~.../^
Amelia Andersdotter
^\...~...~...~...~...~.../^

_______________________________________________________________________________

If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect.

Instead, go to http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11 and then press the LEAVE button.

If there is no LEAVE button here, try http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-RO.

Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html
_______________________________________________________________________________

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11 list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11&A=1


[1]      IEEE 802.18 Wireless Standards Table of Frequency Ranges, 27 Sep 2022. Available online [accessed 9 February 2023]

[2]      IEEE 802.18 Wireless Standards Table of Frequency Ranges, 27 Sep 2022. Available online [accessed 9 February 2023]

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11 list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11&A=1

I

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11 list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11&A=1