| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
| --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---
Some points of clarification… Agree, I would not use the term recently. It was in the original ‘agreed’ text. I would have specified the time frame this allocation took place in the U.S. I don’t know what your or group’s rationale/good reason was for not using the term “allocation” as it relates to frequency!! The words that are used to describe ‘frequency use’ in ITU are “Allocation or Allotted”, which are well understood and widely used terms globally.
From: Benjamin Rolfe <outlook_2CB8745B51AA14EB@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Benjamin Rolfe To address (1) We should delete "recently". The statement remains correct. As to (2) we make this quite clear elsewhere. (3) I don't see that the need for extra words, but your revised version is (mostly) a true statement. It would be better without "recently allocated" to avoid revisiting what "allocated" means and also to avoid debating if 3 years ago is "recently". We had "allowed" instead of "allocated" for a good reason. Otherwise I guess it's fine. From: Vijay Auluck <auluck.vijay@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 4:56 PM Hi Ben,
1. The current version is not clear to me which states….”including recently the 6 GHz…”. The sentence may be incomplete! 2. I think my suggestion may even encourage administrations to start looking into opening the band. 3. Another way to address your point is to add further clarity by saying, “….including the recently allocated 6 GHz band (5925 MHz to 7250 MHz) in the U.S. and other countries, where significant deployments are underway.” Cheers! Vijay From: Benjamin Rolfe <outlook_2CB8745B51AA14EB@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Benjamin Rolfe Here's my problem with the change: "recently allocated" is not true world-wide. As is it is true: 802.11 defines channelization for the band. We are advocating changes to allow 802.11 in the frequency range in those regions were it is not yet allowed. It is technically correct as is and not so much with that change. FWIW Ben From: Vijay Auluck <auluck.vijay@xxxxxxxxx> --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector --- All, My suggested edits are in the attached document, and below:
to read “IEEE 802.11 supports operation in several bands,[2] including the recently allocated 6 GHz band (5925 MHz to 7250 MHz) where significant deployments are underway.” Vijay From: Dorothy Stanley <dstanley1389@xxxxxxxxx> --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector --- Hello Amelia, Thank you for the improved draft. I have some further suggestions in the attached document. Best, Dorothy ---------------------- On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 7:05 AM Amelia Andersdotter <amelia.ieee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11 list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11&A=1 [1] IEEE 802.18 Wireless Standards Table of Frequency Ranges, 27 Sep 2022. Available online [accessed 9 February 2023] [2] IEEE 802.18 Wireless Standards Table of Frequency Ranges, 27 Sep 2022. Available online [accessed 9 February 2023] To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11 list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11&A=1 I To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11 list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11&A=1 |