|
Dear Phillip Barber.
I would appreciate your effort on AdHoc
activities
I think we need a clean-up version including your
comments as followings and it would be good reference to peer review your
contribution..
Even I have a couple of comments on your contribution,
it would not be better at this point according to your mail.
And I'd like to know your schedule when are you going
to distribute a clean-up version so that I can have a chance to revise
my comments
Thanks
Changhoi Koo
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 6:29
AM
Subject: stds-802-16-mobile: Handoff Ad Hoc
group
Itzik,
Just wanted to drop a note and let the Handoff Ad
Hoc group know that I am--taking into consideration Vladimir and your comments
from Session 27 in Denver--re-working my contribution number 54 into r4 of the
current 16e document. I hope to have my submittal ready for the
reflector by the end of this week for peer review.
Based on comments at Session 27, I plan two
changes to my contribution 54 proposal. First, For those who wish to use
Association as a mechanism to set initial power settings for 6.2.9.5 Ranging
instead of using the refined method based on received signal characteristics
interpreted during dowlink/uplink synchronization as presented in the current
iteration of the 16d document, I plan to continue to include Association, but
as an optional, passive activity with application to 6.2.9.5. I
will provide appropriate language. I had previously espoused removal of
Association in its entirety. Second, I will clean-up my sleep-mode
changes to work with contributed changes as of Session 27. Itzik, could
you make a stab at providing my corrected formula and send it to me for
inclusion? I will also clean-up my hand-over flow diagrams to reflect
these changes, including your comments regarding other-Target BS
notifications.
Thanks,
Phillip
Barber
|