Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:38
AM
Subject: Re: stds-802-16-mobile: Handoff
Ad Hoc group
Dear Phillip Barber.
I would appreciate your effort on AdHoc
activities
I think we need a clean-up version including your
comments as followings and it would be good reference to peer review your
contribution..
Even I have a couple of comments on your
contribution, it would not be better at this point according to your
mail.
And I'd like to know your schedule when are you
going to distribute a clean-up version so that I can have a chance
to revise my comments
Thanks
Changhoi Koo
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 6:29
AM
Subject: stds-802-16-mobile: Handoff Ad
Hoc group
Itzik,
Just wanted to drop a note and let the Handoff
Ad Hoc group know that I am--taking into consideration Vladimir and your
comments from Session 27 in Denver--re-working my contribution number 54
into r4 of the current 16e document. I hope to have my submittal ready
for the reflector by the end of this week for peer review.
Based on comments at Session 27, I plan two
changes to my contribution 54 proposal. First, For those who wish to
use Association as a mechanism to set initial power settings for 6.2.9.5
Ranging instead of using the refined method based on received signal
characteristics interpreted during dowlink/uplink synchronization as
presented in the current iteration of the 16d document, I plan to continue
to include Association, but as an optional, passive activity with
application to 6.2.9.5. I will provide appropriate language. I
had previously espoused removal of Association in its entirety.
Second, I will clean-up my sleep-mode changes to work with contributed
changes as of Session 27. Itzik, could you make a stab at
providing my corrected formula and send it to me for inclusion? I
will also clean-up my hand-over flow diagrams to reflect these changes,
including your comments regarding other-Target BS
notifications.
Thanks,
Phillip
Barber