Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Yes, I agree and expect that we work this in the handoff adhoc group as well. NETMAN has been chartered appropriately with a focused scope on MIBs and management plane MAC message primitives. Clearly, we cannot wait for a future PAR to handle handoff related work. Handoff support for a simplified abstraction of an 802.16 RAN would include data that could be transferred to support efficient handovers as well as message primitives to carry such information. However, I expect that the transport protocol(s) for such messages over heterogeneous backhaul links would be out of scope. We may (for performance reasons) want to recommend link performance expectations as informative material. I also expect that would not be able / want to literally mandate every message primitive we come up with as optimizations would be possible based on base station configurations.
Regards. -Prakash
From:
owner-stds-802-16-mobile@listserv.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-16-mobile@listserv.ieee.org]
On Behalf Of Yigal Leiba
Hi All,
I fully agree with Yong Chang.
Regards, Yigal
|