Re: [STDS-802-16-MOBILE] [Handoff] Multiple frequency assignment for the same sector (BS)
Dear Mary, Lalit and all.
I like that a sector has a single FA, of course single DCD.( as in option 2
) therefore, I think we don't need any new ID to identity the sector which
can be identified by BS_ID and Sector_ID.
Best Regard
Jay jin
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16-mobile@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-16-
mobile@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 12:01 AM
To: STDS-802-16-MOBILE@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16-MOBILE] [Handoff] Multiple frequency assignment
for the same sector (BS)
Mary,
Thanks for clearly identifying and stating possible options. I like option
2, which is in line with current definition of BS and Sector in 802.16
domain unless option1 has major advantages over option2.
Lalit
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16-mobile@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG on behalf of Mary
Chion
Sent: Mon 6/7/2004 11:04 PM
To: STDS-802-16-MOBILE@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Cc:
Subject: [STDS-802-16-MOBILE] [Handoff] Multiple frequency
assignment for the same sector (BS)
All,
This is a recap of the discussion for the multiple frequency
assignement of the same sector. There are two options to handle this
configuration:
Option 1:
Change the definition of a sector to allow multiple frequency
assignments. This implies to change DCD message to include multiple FA_IDs
and allow a handover type of intra-sector inter-frequency handoff.
Option 2:
The sector definition remains the same: a sector of single
frequency assignment. The DCD message remains to include one FA_ID. For
multiple frequency assignement for the same sector, each frequency channel
will be the treated as a sector, hence, the identity of a sector should be
defined as: BS ID, sector ID and FA_ID. The handover between frequencies
can be treated the same as inter-sector inter-frequency handoff.
Please provide your comments and hopefully, we can agree on one
option.
Mary Chion