| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear Yeongmoon
and all,
I have reviewed
your contribution and have few items to comments.
1. In
MOB-SLP-RSP message, After-REQ-action could be removed if we use certain value
of
REQ-duration as a indication to MSS not to retransmit
the MOB-SLP-REQ. For example REQ-duration value of '0000' or '1111'
that
is
if the duration of '0000' or '1111' is a value that has to be valid for
"REQ-duration" for certain reasons.(I recommend '1111')
2.
Although messages for Ranging and Traffic Indication has been separated, it
seem to me that incorporating the idea from
LGE's contribution to put in a TLV in RNG-REQ to
inform the MSS for Traffic Arrival since the last listening interval( or last
periodic
ranging) would make the operation more efficient. For the MSS does not have
to wait till the next listening interval
to wake up.
3. In the section
of 6.3.19.4 "Periodic Ranging in sleep mode" The last sentence of the second
paragraph stating 'In the case
periodic ranging procedure fails, MSS has to perform
Initial Ranging procedure or handover to another BS" should be change
to
"In the case periodic ranging procedure fails, MSS has
to perform Initial Ranging procedure." since failure in ranging
would mean
new network entry. It is possible that as the result
of initial ranging procedure MSS would find the BS other than the one it
had
before going into sleep mode(which might look like
handover but it isn't).
I'm with you on
most of the main ideas in your contribution.
Regards,
Kang Il
Koh
|