stds-802-16: RE: results of the Great Lunch Poll
Roger, Great Job !!! At least we know we're not offending the vast majority, and I think
the box lunch has lots of merits, since it's totally flexible with respect to lunch-break
timing and especially since there's a very nice plaza with tables just alongside the
hotel, where folks could sit outside and grab a few rays, while enjoying their lunch.
Also doing some Veggie and/or Kosher boxes should be possible, if you would care
to give an initial estimate for how many of each. We can mid-course correct once
we've seen the actual demand, of course, but maybe some check boxes on the
Pre-Reg page could help to gauge the demand in relative numbers anyway. We'll
make it work and keep at least 95% happy I'm sure !!! :-)
Are you Go for this, now ???
Thanx, Buzz
Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
Boeing SSG
PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
Seattle, WA 98124-2207
ph: (425) 865-2443, fx: (425) 865-6721
email: everett.o.rigsbee@boeing.com
> ----------
> From: Roger B. Marks[SMTP:r.b.marks@ieee.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 3:02 PM
> To: stds-802-16@ieee.org
> Cc: jcarlo@ti.com; Everett.Rigsbee@PSS.Boeing.com; p.nikolich@ieee.org; dawns@facetoface-events.com
> Subject: results of the Great Lunch Poll
> Here are the results of the Great Lunch Poll:
> What do you think of including lunches in the Session #13 registration fee?
> [ 3] - Great idea!!! (could save me some valuable time, etc.)
> [11] - This could work; let's give it a shot.
> [13] - Not sure this is a good idea, but I'll try it this one time.
> [12] - Strongly Object, would prefer a smaller fee instead.
> I count this as 27 in favor of bundled lunch, 12 opposed, and 453
> "don't care" (as I said, "If you don't reply, I'll assume you don't care.")
> We had a number of comments encouraging flexibility. A number liked
> the idea of boxed lunch, and a several mentioned the requirement of a
> vegetarian option.
> Roger
>