RE: stds-802-16: P802.16/D4 Sponsor Ballot Recirculation resultsand approval schedule
Stanley,
Thanks. I've corrected the file.
The comments came in from IEEE in a text format. I have to enter this
into Commentary quasi-manually and made this mistake. I should have
been more careful.
Regards,
Roger
At 10:21 AM -0700 01/10/08, Stanley Wang wrote:
>Hi Roger,
>
>Thank you for the great effort. I only have one minor comment.
>
>Comment 162 misses part of the "Suggested Remedy." The following
>lines/paragraphs are missing from the database:
>
> ***************************
>
>suggested_remedy = Page 31, line 35, add the following normative reference:
>
>"[ITU-T X690] ITU-T Recommendation X.690, "Information Technology --
>ASN.1 Encoding Rules: Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
>Canonical Encoding Rules (CER), and Distinguished Encoding Rules
>(DER)," December 1997."
>
>Page 302, line 34, add the following paragraph:
>
>"
>
> *****************************
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@ieee.org]
>Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:06 AM
>To: stds-802-16@ieee.org
>Subject: stds-802-16: P802.16/D4 Sponsor Ballot Recirculation results
>and approval schedule
>
>
>The P802.16 Sponsor Ballot Recirculation ended last Thursday. The results:
> http://ieee802.org/16/tg1/ballots/sponsorballot/result.html
>are positive. Three of the four Disapprove voters changed their vote
>to Approve. The approval ratio (32/33) is 97%.
>
>Here is the plan:
>
>*We received 14 new comments, all from Stanley Wang. These are published
>here:
> <http://www.ieee802.org/16/docs/01/80216-01_51.pdf>
>Ten of them are editorial, and all are essentially straightforward
>corrections to errors. Unless I hear objections, I will consider them
>to be accepted.
>
>*I will create Draft 5 this week from the 149 comments in the
>original Sponsor Ballot and the 14 from the recirc.
>
>*In accordance with our schedule <http://ieee802.org/16/tg1/schedule.html>,
>I will work with the IEEE Balloting Center to get a final
>Confirmation Ballot on Draft 5 opened by this Friday.
>
>*We are still on track to file an application for approval to RevCom
>by the October 26 deadline. I expect final approval of the standard
>on December 6.
>
>*It is likely that Draft 5 will be the last draft until after
>December 6, when our IEEE staff project editor will make editorial
>revisions. Those changes will be small.
>
>*Since the TG3/4 document is an amendment to P802.16, its structure
>is highly dependent on that of the base document. Therefore, before
>we begin a Working Group Letter Ballot of the TG3/4 draft, it's
>important to review that document to ensure that the structure and
>clause references are consistent with Draft 5. This should be done
>before Session #16.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Roger