stds-802-16: RE: 802.18 Document for Review (FCC/ARRL)
Nico,
Here is what Carl told me:
>Please try to get this passed without changes ... changes
>will cause me deadline problems. This must be filed on
>May 30, and I have to give SEC a 5 day review period.
>
>Everyone here (.18 folks, plus Bob H. and Stuart K.)
>were very happy with the document.
I've already asked him if May 24 is too late for 802.16's answer, but
I haven't heard an answer yet. On a calendar basis, it should be OK,
but it might be a bit tight.
I suggest you move, at the Opening Plenary, to modify the agenda to
add this item.
Roger
At 2:13 PM -0700 02/05/16, <nico.Vanwaes@nokia.com> wrote:
>Roger,
>
>Please note that the filing deadline for the reply cycle in this
>proceeding is May 27. I noticed Mr. Stevenson filed a request for
>extension of the comment and reply cycles to May 31 and June 28
>respectively, though I don't know if this has been granted.
>
>Even if so, it might be prudent for 802.16 not to unnecessarily
>delay this document and get it to the SEC asap for consideration.
>Hence I would request putting it on the opening agenda instead. If
>many members then feel uncomfortable to approve it without further
>review (which I doubt since 802.18 did an excellent job in my
>opinion), they can always motion to table till the mid-week or
>closing plenary.
>
>Regards,
>
>/Nico