RE: stds-802-16: 802.18 draft: Reply Comments on 5 GHz NPRM
I paste here the text that was in the July document:
19. While we fully realize that the power limits for the 5150-5350
and 5470-5725 MHz bands have been set by recent changes to the
ITU Radio Regulations, and furthermore that the subject of additional
"high power" spectrum in the 5 GHz region is beyond the scope of the
instant NPRM, we are not convinced that the Commission's
expectation as stated above is necessarily correct.
20. The 5725-5825MHz U-NII "high-power" band is currently used
by WLANs (IEEE 802.11a), point to point systems, point to multipoint
WAN/local broadband wireless access systems (IEEE 802.16 and
other systems), and numerous other Part 15 systems, including
cordless phones. We therefore have a general concern that the
Commission's expectation that the 100 MHz of the 5725-5825 MHz
band will remain sufficient for higher power operations may not be
realistic, particularly if the band is used by more than one public
access or public service operator in the same geographic area.
Marianna
-----Original Message-----
From: Marianna Goldhammer
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 2:23 PM
To: 'Roger B. Marks'; stds-802-16@ieee.org
Cc: Ley John-QSTO04 (E-mail); Carl R Stevenson (Carl) (E-mail)
Subject: RE: stds-802-16: 802.18 draft: Reply Comments on 5 GHz NPRM
Hi,
I recommend to "NOT APPROVE" the proposed text.
5 GHz NPRM, pct. 18, is asking for comments regarding the
spectrum for high power operations:
" We expect that the 100 MHz of spectrum that is already available at
5.725-5.825 GHz will remain sufficient for higher power operations.
We note in particular that operations over longer distances employ
directional antennas that allow for high reuse and sharing of the spectrum,
which mitigates the need for additional spectrum for these types of
operations. We seek comment on this analysis."
In July 802.18 meeting, at my and Ley John's request, the 802.18 agreed
response was to make clear that this spectrum is not enough (appropriate
text was in the document; as result of my satisfaction I supported the
document approval, as seconder).
The mentioned response shall be re-inserted.
I request that 802.18 input documents are posted on the Server,
(my July input document is not on the 802.18 contribution list, but
has been discussed) and the outputs as well, according to
IEEE 802 rules. July output is also not available on 802.18 Server
(wrong link).
Best Regards,
Marianna
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@ieee.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 1:31 AM
To: stds-802-16@ieee.org
Subject: stds-802-16: 802.18 draft: Reply Comments on 5 GHz NPRM
As noted below, the 802.18 TAG is considering a submission to the FCC
and has sent it to the 802.11 and 802.15 plenaries in Singapore for
review.
Carl has uploaded the draft for our review. See the document
beginning "18-03-0061" at <http://wg.wirelessman.org>.
Let me know if you have comments.
Roger
>Dear folks,
>
>Please note that document 18-03-0061-00-0000_802_18_Rep_Cmts_ET-03-122.doc
>is on the server in the 802.18 documents section.
>
>This document was approved this afternoon by 802.18, and I intend to bring
>WG approval motions to the .11 and .15 mid-week plenaries on Wed.
>
>Your attention to this matter would be appreciated.
>
>Regards,
>Carl R. Stevenson
>Chair, IEEE 802.18 Radio Regulatory Technical Advisory Group
>610-965-8799 (home office)
>610-712-3217 (fax mailbox)
>610-570-6168 (cellphone)
>Short Message Service: 6105706168@voicestream.net
>carl.stevenson@ieee.org
This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
****************************************************************************
********
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
viruses.
****************************************************************************
********
This mail was sent via mail.alvarion.com
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************