[STDS-802-16] CORRECTION: Results of BRC voting on IEEE P802.16-REVd/D4 recirc comment resolutions
[Oops: I made an error, accidentally duplicating some votes. The new
database, is r6, as noted below. There is only one change in result:
Comment 159 changed from Rejected to Reconsidered. I want to thank
Ofer Kelman for quickly calling the problem to my attention. -Roger]
The results of the BRC voting on the proposed resolutions of comment
received in the P802.16-REVd/D4 recirc are posted:
http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_20r6.zip
The numbers are:
20 Withdrawn
298 Accepted
30 Rejected
28 Reconsider
The comments in the last category are those which received at least
40% but less than 75% approval. According to the procedure
<http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_18r1.pdf>, the BRC will
reconsider these comments. Those who submitted the comments to be
reconsidered are now given the opportunity to revise their comment
once again, with a deadline of 4 May AOE.
Roger
>Roger
>
>The deadline for revised IEEE P802.16-REVd/D4 comments has passed.
>The data is available here:
> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_20r4.zip
>
>The revised comments are in the fields "Recommendation", "Proposed
>Resolution", "Reason for Recommendation", and "Recommendation by".
>
>We also received a number of new and revised contributions. I've
>filed most of these on the TGd web page. I'll catch up with the last
>three soon.
>
>The Ballot Resolution Committee (BRC) will now begin considering
>each of these proposals. Each member may vote either "Accept" or
>"Reject" on each revised comment. See the procedure document for
>details.
>
>I will email the voting instructions to the BRC separately (I've had
>some technical difficulties, but I have a backup plan). In the
>meantime, I suggest that you carefully review the database and begin
>discussing the final comments with your colleagues as you deem
>appropriate.
>
>Roger
>
>
>>We received 1305 reply comments to the comments received in the
>>P802.16-REVd/D4 Sponsor Ballot recirculation.
>>
>>These reply comments have been added to the comment package, which
>>is now available:
>> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_20r2.zip
>>
>>The file is set to open to a layout showing the replies, in
>>abbreviated form. If more than three replies were submitted for a
>>given comment, you will need to scroll to see them all. For a more
>>spacious view of the reply comments, click "See reply details"
>>above the colored Reply Comment table.
>>
>>In accordance with the announced comment resolution procedures:
>> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_18r1.pdf
>>those who submitted the original comments are now invited to
>>reconsider their comments in the light of:
>>
>>(a) the reply comments
>>(b) other comments in the database that address relevant issues
>>
>>To submit your revised comment, please follow the same procedure
>>for submitting Reply Comments, using the fields "Recommendation ",
>>" Proposed Resolution ", " Reason for Recommendation ", and "
>>Recommendation by". Email your revised comment files to
>>ballot16d@wirelessman.org by Wednesday 28 April AOE (Anywhere on
>>Earth).
>>
>>ADVICE TO COMMENTORS:
>>
>>In light of the defined procedure, there will be no opportunity for
>>the Ballot Resolution Committee (BRC) to alter the revised
>>comments; the BRC can only accept or reject them. Therefore, those
>>who submitted comments are strongly encouraged to study the
>>database, not only with respect to their own comments but also with
>>respect to related comments. If you have a concern that related
>>comments might affect yours, please contact the other balloter to
>>coordinate your responses. Please ensure that your Suggested Remedy
>>is fully explicit, with detailed changes by page and line number,
>>so that the editor may implement it without doubt as to your
>>intent. If your comment refers to an external contribution, please
>>refer to its explicit contribution number, including the revision
>>number, at <http://ieee802.org/16/tgd/#Contributions>.
>>
>>Please remember that your revised comment will be voted upon,
>>verbatim, by the BRC. The BRC members, when considering their vote,
>>will look to see whether your comment makes a convincing argument
>>in favor of the need for a change to the draft. They will also be
>>looking for evidence that you have fully addressed all concerns
>>raised in the reply comments and have considered alternatives
>>proposed there. You are encouraged eliminate any doubt the BRC
>>members have doubts about the change.
>>
>>Please contact me with any questions.
>>
>>Roger