Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] Resolution of comment 332



Title: Re: [STDS-802-16] Reply Comments for IEEE P802.16-REVd
All,
 
I suggested deletion of 11.7.3 because expression "IP Management" seems misleading. It is correct that SNMP/IP datagrams must be carried over Secondary Management connection. But "backward implication"  is not true: the standard does not request
all traffic over the connection to be necessarily IP based [as well as necessarily related to the management]. By the way, DHCP messages are not IP based. My understanding of Secondary Management connection role is to carry traffic from / to the SS itself.
particularly, this traffic does not pass CS SAP, but rather goes from / to Management Entities [Fig. 1]
 
Vladimir
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Nelson [mailto:bob_nelson@IEEE.ORG]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 11:18 AM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] Resolution of comment 332

BRC Members,

 

Based on the voting results, the decision to resolve issues regarding "11.7.3 IP management mode" are still on the floor. Comment 332 which was an attempt on my part to restore the original definition of the parameter only received a 65.8% approval rating. Comment 336 from Vladimir observes that the current definitions of "11.7.3 IP management mode" and "11.7.2 SS management support" are essentially equivalent and one (11.7.3) should be deleted. It received a 65.6% vote for acceptance. Other comments on the same section were rejected.

 

Since both comments agree that the current text is broken, I would like to assure that some action is taken to repair it. As a result,

I welcome comments from anyone (particularly those that voted to reject 332) with suggestions for modifications to the proposed resolution text that would allow it to reach 75% acceptance. Alternately, if there is sufficient support for deleting the parameter, that's OK too.

 

Thanks

Bob

 

 

 

 



This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com

************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
This mail was sent via mail.alvarion.com

************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************