Re: [STDS-802-16] CORRECTION: Results of BRC voting on IEEE P802.16-REVd/D4 recirc comment resolutions
Another embarrassing but very minor update: in 20r6, the Abstain
count was incorrect. Thanks to Vladimir Yanover for noticing! I've
fixed this and posted a new 20r6. I couldn't stand to make it r7, but
I thought I needed to note the change in the file.
Roger
>[Oops: I made an error, accidentally duplicating some votes. The new
>database, is r6, as noted below. There is only one change in result:
>Comment 159 changed from Rejected to Reconsidered. I want to thank
>Ofer Kelman for quickly calling the problem to my attention. -Roger]
>
>The results of the BRC voting on the proposed resolutions of comment
>received in the P802.16-REVd/D4 recirc are posted:
> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_20r6.zip
>
>The numbers are:
> 20 Withdrawn
> 298 Accepted
> 30 Rejected
> 28 Reconsider
>
>The comments in the last category are those which received at least
>40% but less than 75% approval. According to the procedure
><http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_18r1.pdf>, the BRC will
>reconsider these comments. Those who submitted the comments to be
>reconsidered are now given the opportunity to revise their comment
>once again, with a deadline of 4 May AOE.
>
>Roger
>
>
>>Roger
>>
>>The deadline for revised IEEE P802.16-REVd/D4 comments has passed.
>>The data is available here:
>> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_20r4.zip
>>
>>The revised comments are in the fields "Recommendation", "Proposed
>>Resolution", "Reason for Recommendation", and "Recommendation by".
>>
>>We also received a number of new and revised contributions. I've
>>filed most of these on the TGd web page. I'll catch up with the
>>last three soon.
>>
>>The Ballot Resolution Committee (BRC) will now begin considering
>>each of these proposals. Each member may vote either "Accept" or
>>"Reject" on each revised comment. See the procedure document for
>>details.
>>
>>I will email the voting instructions to the BRC separately (I've
>>had some technical difficulties, but I have a backup plan). In the
>>meantime, I suggest that you carefully review the database and
>>begin discussing the final comments with your colleagues as you
>>deem appropriate.
>>
>>Roger
>>
>>
>>>We received 1305 reply comments to the comments received in the
>>>P802.16-REVd/D4 Sponsor Ballot recirculation.
>>>
>>>These reply comments have been added to the comment package, which
>>>is now available:
>>> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_20r2.zip
>>>
>>>The file is set to open to a layout showing the replies, in
>>>abbreviated form. If more than three replies were submitted for a
>>>given comment, you will need to scroll to see them all. For a more
>>>spacious view of the reply comments, click "See reply details"
>>>above the colored Reply Comment table.
>>>
>>>In accordance with the announced comment resolution procedures:
>>> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_18r1.pdf
>>>those who submitted the original comments are now invited to
>>>reconsider their comments in the light of:
>>>
>>>(a) the reply comments
>>>(b) other comments in the database that address relevant issues
>>>
>>>To submit your revised comment, please follow the same procedure
>>>for submitting Reply Comments, using the fields "Recommendation ",
>>>" Proposed Resolution ", " Reason for Recommendation ", and "
>>>Recommendation by". Email your revised comment files to
>>>ballot16d@wirelessman.org by Wednesday 28 April AOE (Anywhere on
>>>Earth).
>>>
>>>ADVICE TO COMMENTORS:
>>>
>>>In light of the defined procedure, there will be no opportunity
>>>for the Ballot Resolution Committee (BRC) to alter the revised
>>>comments; the BRC can only accept or reject them. Therefore, those
>>>who submitted comments are strongly encouraged to study the
>>>database, not only with respect to their own comments but also
>>>with respect to related comments. If you have a concern that
>>>related comments might affect yours, please contact the other
>>>balloter to coordinate your responses. Please ensure that your
>>>Suggested Remedy is fully explicit, with detailed changes by page
>>>and line number, so that the editor may implement it without doubt
>>>as to your intent. If your comment refers to an external
>>>contribution, please refer to its explicit contribution number,
>>>including the revision number, at
>>><http://ieee802.org/16/tgd/#Contributions>.
>>>
>>>Please remember that your revised comment will be voted upon,
>>>verbatim, by the BRC. The BRC members, when considering their
>>>vote, will look to see whether your comment makes a convincing
>>>argument in favor of the need for a change to the draft. They will
>>>also be looking for evidence that you have fully addressed all
>>>concerns raised in the reply comments and have considered
>>>alternatives proposed there. You are encouraged eliminate any
>>>doubt the BRC members have doubts about the change.
>>>
>>>Please contact me with any questions.
>>>
>>>Roger