Re: [STDS-802-16] [802SEC] Reminder on TV Band PAR for consideration
There was no attachment, hence no context.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Avi Freedman
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 4:57 PM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] [802SEC] Reminder on TV Band PAR for
consideration
This PAR clearly overlaps a a large part of 802.16 activities:
1. The application, broadband wireless access, is identical to that of
802.16
2. The frequency band is identical to that covered by 802.16 (especially
after the approval of 802.16 -2004, where the lower frequency limit was
removed).
3. The issue of detection and avoidance of licensed users is also
addressed
by 802.16
I would recommend that the chair be directed by the 802.16 WG to vote
against the approval of the PAR on the grounds that unique identity has
not
beeen established.
Thanks
Avi Freedman
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@IEEE.ORG>
To: <STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] [802SEC] Reminder on TV Band PAR for
consideration
> I have learned of a new PAR submittal from 802.18 that proposes to
> create an 802.22. See the note below. For more detail, see the end of
> this table:
>
> http://ieee802.org/16/meetings/mtg32/lmsc/pars.html
>
> Roger
>
>
> >I can find no record of having received this material in
> >the timeframe required by our P&P. I believe that
> >the requirements for advance notice of new PARs have not
> >been met.
> >
> >I will therefore vote against approval.
> >
> >Howard
> >
> >Stevenson, Carl R (Carl) wrote:
> >
> >>Dear EC members,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Attached, as a reminder/so you have it handy, is a copy of the TV
Band
> >>PAR/5C from 802.18 SG1 for consideration this week. This is
proposed as
> >>P802.22.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Per Paul's instructions, I pre-submitted this to the NESCOM
> >>administrator for review/consideration in the current cycle so we
don't
> >>have to wait until September.
> >>
> >>(Of course, any changes this week will be submitted to NESCOM
promptly
> >>and the PAR will be withdrawn from NESCOM consideration should the
EC
> >>not approve it.)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>When pre-submitting, I put myself down as interim chair as a
> >>"placeholder," but that should change this week.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>
> >>Carl R. Stevenson
> >>Chair, IEEE 802.18 Radio Regulatory Technical Advisory Group
> >>IEEE Liaison to ITU-R
> >>610-965-8799 (home office)
> >>610-712-3217 (fax mailbox)
> >>610-570-6168 (cellphone)
> >>Short Message Service: 6105706168@voicestream.net
> >>carl.stevenson@ieee.org
>