Re: [STDS-802-16] Request for clarification: Idle mode retain information Bit #6
Phil and all,
Thank you for the kind and prompt reply.
If no one disagree with Phil, wouldn't it be better to explicitly
require Bit #6 to be 0 so as for the Bits #0-#5 to be interpreted as in
the current draft?
If we do so, we'll have additional 64 reserved combinations of Bits
#0-#5 (when Bit #6 is 1) that can be used for further optimizations,
which may be necessary in the future.
As to Bit #7, I'm preparing a proposal of using the bit to limit the
resource retention when Bit #2 or Bit #6 is set so that only the
resource of the service flows with positive Resource Retention
Preference (or Paging Preference) should be retained.
Thank you,
Jeong
--
Moo Ryong Jeong, Ph. D
DoCoMo Communications Laboratories USA, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Phillip Barber [mailto:pbarber@broadbandmobiletech.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 2:58 PM
To: Moo Ryong Jeong; STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Cc: Ronny Kim; Kim Minsung; ???; Chulsik Yoon; Mo-Han Fong
Subject: Re: Request for clarification: Idle mode retain information Bit
#6
I think that setting Bit#6 to '1' is just like setting Bits#0-5 to '1'
PLUS it includes retention of other stateful elements like MAC state
machines, counters, CS classifiers, etc...
So when Bit#6 is set to '1', the values for all other Bits are
meaningless.
Thanks,
Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moo Ryong Jeong" <jeong@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: <ronnykim@lge.com>; <cyberk@kt.co.kr>;
<pbarber@BROADBANDMOBILETECH.COM>; <jungje.son@samsung.com>;
<csyoon@etri.re.kr>; <mhfong@nortelnetworks.com>;
<STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org>
Cc: "Toshiro Kawahara" <kawahara@docomolabs-usa.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 4:26 PM
Subject: Request for clarification: Idle mode retain information Bit #6
Hi all,
Can anybody clarify the usage of idle mode retain information Bit #6?
When the bit is set (to 1), is it possible for any other bit (that is,
any of the Bits #0-#5) to be unset?
The answer appears dependent on the interpretation of the term "Full
service." If "Full service" excludes the services associated with
SBC-REQ/RSP, PKM-REQ/RSP, REG-REQ/RSP, Network Address, Time of Day, and
TFTP (as opposed to the meaning of "Full service"), then the answer
would be YES. Otherwise (that is, if it includes all the services
related with Bits #0-#5 and possibly something more), the answer would
be NO.
Thanks,
Jeong
--
Moo Ryong Jeong, Ph. D
DoCoMo Communications Laboratories USA, Inc.
181 Metro Drive, Suite 300
San Jose, CA 95110, USA
(408) 451-4761 Tel
(408) 573-1090 Fax
**********************Confidentiality Note**********************
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this e-mail and
any attachment to it and may be covered by existing non-disclosure or
confidentiality agreements. If you are not the addressee (or authorized
to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to
anyone any information contained in this e-mail. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply
e-mail and delete it from your system. Thank you very much.
*************************************************************