[STDS-802-16] Reply Comments regarding comments received in P802.16e/D5 Sponsor Ballot
The P802.16e/D5 Sponsor Ballot Comment Report is now available with
Reply Comments:
http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_69r1.zip
There were 2300 Reply Comments, from about 40 people.
Roger
>This note specifies additional details in the Call for Reply
>Comments regarding the P802.16e/D5 Sponsor Ballot Comment Report:
> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_69.zip
>
>The deadline is Thursday 11 November AOE. The instructions are below.
>
>Roger
>
>----------------
>To create and submit reply comments:
>
>(1) Obtain Commentary <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/Commentary>, if
>you don't have it.
>
>(2) Unzip the Comment Report to get a ".USR" file, which will open
>in Commentary.
>
>(3) Read the comments in Commentary. When you want to respond to a
>comment, check the "Marked" box at the top of that record. Then fill
>out the following fields:
>
>Recommendation by:
>Recommendation:
>Proposed Resolution:
>Reason for Recommendation:
>
>You are justified in recommending rejection on grounds of
>incompleteness or lack of a specific change request.
>
>(4) When you are finished entering replies, look under Scripts and
>choose "Find Marked Records". This will find the records for which
>you checked the "Marked" box. Only the found records will be
>exported in Step (5). Don't include records on which you have no
>reply comment.
>
>(5) Under Scripts, choose "Export Clause Editor's Proposals". Choose
>the file type "FileMaker Pro Runtime Files". Enter a file name of
>the form "SB16e_reply_Name.USR", where "Name" is your name.
>
>(6) Upload the exported file to <http://tgeballot.wirelessman.org>.
>
>Dr. Roger B. Marks <mailto:marks@nist.gov> +1 303 497 7837
>National Institute of Standards and Technology/Boulder, CO, USA
>Chair, IEEE 802.16 Working Group on Broadband Wireless Access
> <http://WirelessMAN.org>
>
>
>>The P802.16e/D5 Sponsor Ballot comments are available in Commentary format:
>> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_69.zip
>>
>>TGe has a large task ahead of it, because 1973 comments were
>>received in this ballot. It would have been much larger, but I
>>spent a lot of time eliminating exact duplicate comments submitted
>>by groups ranging from 2 to 10 people. In these cases, I included
>>only one copy, with a note listing all the people who submitted it.
>>In the future, I would prefer that people not submit duplicate
>>comments. It impedes progress.
>>
>>I also spent a lot of time trying to assign page numbers to
>>comments lacking them. I don't like doing this, and I don't like
>>the delay it causes. However, without page numbers, the comments
>>don't sort correctly, which delays the comment resolution process.
>>Besides, the group doesn't want to spend its valuable time trying
>>to discern what page you are talking about. I request that all
>>balloters please be considerate of the rest of the WG, remembering
>>that we are not dealing with your comments alone.
>>
>>Please begin preparing Reply Comments. The deadline is 11 November AOE.
>>
>>Roger