[STDS-802-16] UPDATE 2a: P802.16e/D7 Sponsor Ballot Results and Call for Reply Comments
We still have 445 comments.
http://ieee802.org/16/docs/05/80216-05_023r2a.zip
The r2 that I previously uploaded was incomplete. Please don't use
it, because it had some incorrect comment numbers. Sorry about that!
Roger
>We now have 445 comments.
> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/05/80216-05_023r2.zip
>
>16 of these are from Lei Wang. She submitted them on time, but I
>accidentally included them in the 802.16f database. I'll update that
>one.
>
>15 are from Mark Cudak. He uploaded a database on time, but the
>comments were all blank.
>
>1 is a late comment from Nico van Waes.
>
>By the way, when I do these updates, I don't change the old comment
>numbers, so any reply comments you have generated with an old
>version will still work with the new one.
>
>Roger
>
>>We now have 413 comments.
>> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/05/80216-05_023r1.zip
>>
>>Comments 4385-4328 were all submitted on time. However, I
>>overlooked them in compiling the first database. Fortunately, they
>>sort correctly since none of them includes a page number. My
>>apologies.
>>
>>Comments 4389-4413 are late submissions.
>>
>>Also, some of the comments designated as "L" ("late") in the
>>previous database were actually on time. In the r1 version, I've
>>deleted the "L" from those.
>>
>>Roger
>>
>>
>>
>>>The P802.16e/D7 Sponsor Ballot closed several hours ago. By my
>>>approximate count, the result was 110 Approve, 30 Disapprove (79%
>>>Approval). For the first time, this exceeds the 75% threshold.
>>>
>>>We have 384 comments.
>>> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/05/80216-05_023.zip
>>>Any comment whose number has an appended "L" was submitted late.
>>>
>>>This note is a Call for Reply Comments, with a deadline of Monday
>>>2 May at 8 am local time in Sorrento, Italy
>>><http://tinyurl.com/5a8ss>.
>>>
>>>The instructions are below.
>>>
>>>Roger
>>>
>>>----------------
>>>To create and submit reply comments:
>>>
>>>(1) Obtain Commentary <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/Commentary>, if
>>>you don't have it.
>>>
>>>(2) Unzip the Comment Report to get a ".USR" file, which will open
>>>in Commentary.
>>>
>>>(3) Read the comments in Commentary. When you want to respond to a
>>>comment, check the "Marked" box at the top of that record. Then
>>>fill out the following fields:
>>>
>>>Recommendation by:
>>>Recommendation:
>>>Proposed Resolution:
>>>Reason for Recommendation:
>>>
>>>You are justified in recommending rejection on grounds of
>>>incompleteness or lack of a specific change request.
>>>
>>>(4) When you are finished entering replies, look under Scripts and
>>>choose "Find Marked Records". This will find the records for which
>>>you checked the "Marked" box. Only the found records will be
>>>exported in Step (5). Don't include records on which you have no
>>>reply comment.
>>>
>>>(5) Under Scripts, choose "Export Clause Editor's Proposals".
>>>Choose the file type "FileMaker Pro Runtime Files". Enter a file
>>>name of the form "SB16e_reply_Name.USR", where "Name" is your name.
>>>
>>>(6) Upload the exported file to
>>><http://tgeballot.wirelessman.org>. That site is continuously
>>>on-line. However, if you have trouble with that URL, try
>>><http://dot16.org>.
>>>
>>>Dr. Roger B. Marks <mailto:marks@nist.gov> +1 303 497 7837
>>>National Institute of Standards and Technology/Boulder, CO, USA
>>>Chair, IEEE 802.16 Working Group on Broadband Wireless Access
>>> <http://WirelessMAN.org>